From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20387 invoked by alias); 8 Mar 2002 07:44:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 20311 invoked from network); 8 Mar 2002 07:44:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO frigg.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.16) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 8 Mar 2002 07:44:26 -0000 Received: from zaretsky (diup-216-25.inter.net.il [213.8.216.25]) by frigg.inter.net.il (Mirapoint) with ESMTP id BGM15807; Fri, 8 Mar 2002 09:43:17 +0200 (IST) Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2002 23:44:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: ac131313@cygnus.com Message-Id: <2427-Fri08Mar2002094043+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il> X-Mailer: emacs 21.2.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9 CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <3C87C97F.5080102@cygnus.com> (message from Andrew Cagney on Thu, 07 Mar 2002 15:11:43 -0500) Subject: Re: ["patch"/doc] GDB version and branch names Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <3C86CC4E.6050801@cygnus.com> <2110-Thu07Mar2002220155+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il> <3C87C97F.5080102@cygnus.com> X-SW-Source: 2002-03/txt/msg00114.txt.bz2 > Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2002 15:11:43 -0500 > From: Andrew Cagney > > > Finally, I wonder if we really need to explain all that in so many > > words. (But I won't object if you think it's useful.) > > If you can think of ways of trimming it down, please do. It seemed to me that part about the version-naming scheme is too long. I thought it could just describe the principles, without so many examples.