From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25623 invoked by alias); 6 Aug 2004 09:23:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 25576 invoked from network); 6 Aug 2004 09:23:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO aragorn.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.23) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 6 Aug 2004 09:23:52 -0000 Received: from zaretski (pns03-194-35.inter.net.il [80.230.194.35]) by aragorn.inter.net.il (MOS 3.4.6-GR) with ESMTP id EBY44009; Fri, 6 Aug 2004 12:23:30 +0300 (IDT) Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2004 09:23:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: Michael Chastain Message-Id: <2427-Fri06Aug2004122106+0300-eliz@gnu.org> CC: cagney@gnu.org, neroden@twcny.rr.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <41128D23.nailJQR1E8AX6@mindspring.com> (message from Michael Chastain on Thu, 05 Aug 2004 15:40:19 -0400) Subject: Re: [PATCH] Convert utils/sparclite to autoconf 2.59 Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <41126FA4.2020302@twcny.rr.com> <41128D23.nailJQR1E8AX6@mindspring.com> X-SW-Source: 2004-08/txt/msg00153.txt.bz2 > Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2004 15:40:19 -0400 > From: Michael Chastain > > utils/misc/doschk/doschk.c is identical to doschk.c from the > doschk-1.1 package, which is available from: > > ftp.gnu.org/pub/non-gnu/doschk/doschk-1.1.tar.gz > > I just build the standalone package and use that. Works great for me. > So I don't see any reason to keep doschk in utils. Eli? Andrew? I don't see any reason to keep in the tree something that is available as a separate package. But then I never understood why we have texinfo and standards, either.