From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27044 invoked by alias); 12 Jan 2010 00:04:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 27025 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Jan 2010 00:04:47 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from p12018-ipbffx02marunouchi.tokyo.ocn.ne.jp (HELO mail.pizzafactory.jp) (222.147.75.18) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 00:04:43 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.pizzafactory.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3549592381E; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 09:04:46 +0900 (JST) Received: from mail.pizzafactory.jp ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ldap.monami-software.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id madlH+rz2-Po; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 09:04:46 +0900 (JST) Received: from [192.168.0.9] (unknown [192.168.0.9]) by mail.pizzafactory.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 386C35923817; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 09:04:46 +0900 (JST) Subject: Re: Can't set architecture to m32c on m32c-elf-gdb. Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1077) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Masaki Muranaka In-Reply-To: <4B4719A5.6020609@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 00:04:00 -0000 Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz , gdb-patches@sourceware.org, binutils@sourceware.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <23AFDDF7-E1CC-4714-9AE1-C391AAC92D8F@monami-software.com> References: <20081203140802.GA6965@caradoc.them.org> <50B2818F-7217-4D63-ABE8-19E444FE9A40@monami-software.com> <4B3C9784.1040309@redhat.com> <21F11493-3DE3-41FA-97D5-B539B54259A2@monami-software.com> <4B44A991.4010101@redhat.com> <271DFD02-74A7-4296-8253-AF4E24A38ADA@monami-software.com> <4B460270.5060808@redhat.com> <440A363D-401D-45C2-ADCB-B80AF3B3048D@monami-software.com> <4B4719A5.6020609@redhat.com> To: Nick Clifton X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-01/txt/msg00283.txt.bz2 Hello Nick, Ok. It might only has to think at that time about R32C. Thanks On 2010/01/08, at 20:40, Nick Clifton wrote: > Hi Masaki, >=20 >> Hello Nick, >> Though I've not tried your patch yet, it also will works fine. >> But I feel my patch is better. >> Renesas is planning to ship R32C series. They have a lot of extensions b= ut basically based on M32C. >> R32C aims automovice areas, so it's possible they have some custom varia= tions. >> I think it's better to specify architecture by printable name like cpu-a= rm.c >=20 > But that is what my patch does. It fixes the scanning code in the bfd li= brary so that when the user enters: >=20 > set architecture m32c >=20 > in gdb it will correctly locate the m32c architecture and not the m16c ar= chitecture as it was doing previously. >=20 > Cheers > Nick >=20