Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ilya Leoshkevich via Gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
To: Tom Tromey <tromey@adacore.com>, Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>
Cc: Ulrich Weigand <ulrich.weigand@de.ibm.com>,
	Andreas Arnez <arnez@linux.ibm.com>,
	gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Pedro Alves <pedro@palves.net>
Subject: [PING^2] [PATCH v2 0/7] gdb.perf/: Add JIT performance test
Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2022 12:52:42 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2303df1afed8c2a5f623bfcb2c0e5167ce2d5b2e.camel@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220530221147.1991835-1-iii@linux.ibm.com>

On Tue, 2022-05-31 at 00:11 +0200, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> This series implements a JIT performance test as discussed in [1].
> Patch 1 is a small fix, patches 2-6 are preparations and patch 7 is
> the test itself.
> 
> ChangeLog:
> v1: https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2022-May/189427.html
> v1 -> v2:
> * Make sure shared objects contain virtual addresses they are loaded
>   at by reusing parts of jit-elf-helpers.exp.  By default, virtual
>   addresses in all shared objects are relative to 0 - this creates a
>   lots of overlaps and forces sort_cmp () to go through the slow
> "Sort
>   on sequence number of the objfile in the chain" path, which is not
> a
>   useful performance testing scenario.
> * Fix DEFAULT_BINARY_LINK_WITH_SHLIBS style (Andrew).
> * Rename SHLIB to TOTAL_NR_SHLIBS (Andrew).
> * Add SOLIB_COUNT (Andrew).
> * Drop "gdb.perf/: Compile the binary with -DSHLIB", it's superseded
> by
>   "Allow adjusting GenPerfTest compile options".
> 
> The test can be used as follows:
> 
> $ make build-perf -j"$(nproc)" RUNTESTFLAGS=jit.exp
> $ make check-perf RUNTESTFLAGS=jit-check.exp GDB_PERFTEST_MODE=run
> 
> The results can be converted to gnuplot-friendly format as follows:
> 
> $ perl -ne 'if (/:register_times:(\d+) (.+)/) { print "$1 $2\n"; }' \
>       <gdb.perf/outputs/jit/pieces/perftest.sum >jit.txt
> 
> I've uploaded the results to [2].  They are similar to the ones from
> Andrew and show that [1] is an improvement.  The third result shown
> on
> the chart is from [3] - with it I can pass the 10k JITed objects mark
> and debug CoreCLR JIT with GDB.  It's still WIP though - the
> testsuite
> shows a couple of failures.
> 
> Best regards,
> Ilya
> 
> [1] https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2022-May/189341.html
> [2]
> https://github.com/iii-i/binutils-gdb/blob/section-map-20220530-2/gdb/testsuite/jit.png
> [3]
> https://github.com/iii-i/binutils-gdb/commits/section-map-20220530-2
> 
> Ilya Leoshkevich (7):
>   gdb.perf/: Fix tcl_string_list_to_python_list {x}
>   gdb.perf/: Add binary_link_with_shlibs setting to GenPerfTest
>   gdb.perf/: Allow adjusting GenPerfTest compile options
>   gdb.base/: Introduce jit-protocol-util.h
>   gdb.base/: Introduce jit_compile_options
>   gdb.base/: Introduce n_jit_so_address
>   gdb.perf/: Add JIT performance test
> 
>  gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/jit-elf-fork-main.c | 48 ++----------
>  gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/jit-elf-main.c      | 48 ++----------
>  gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/jit-elf-util.h      | 17 +++++
>  gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/jit-protocol-util.h | 74 ++++++++++++++++++
>  gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/jit-reader-host.c   |  8 +-
>  gdb/testsuite/gdb.perf/jit-check.exp       | 25 +++++++
>  gdb/testsuite/gdb.perf/jit-check.py        | 60 +++++++++++++++
>  gdb/testsuite/gdb.perf/jit-solib.c         | 27 +++++++
>  gdb/testsuite/gdb.perf/jit.c               | 87
> ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  gdb/testsuite/gdb.perf/jit.exp             | 79 ++++++++++++++++++++
>  gdb/testsuite/lib/gen-perf-test.exp        | 54 +++++++++++---
>  gdb/testsuite/lib/jit-elf-helpers.exp      | 22 ++++--
>  gdb/testsuite/lib/perftest.exp             |  2 +-
>  13 files changed, 439 insertions(+), 112 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/jit-protocol-util.h
>  create mode 100644 gdb/testsuite/gdb.perf/jit-check.exp
>  create mode 100644 gdb/testsuite/gdb.perf/jit-check.py
>  create mode 100644 gdb/testsuite/gdb.perf/jit-solib.c
>  create mode 100644 gdb/testsuite/gdb.perf/jit.c
>  create mode 100644 gdb/testsuite/gdb.perf/jit.exp

Ping.

      parent reply	other threads:[~2022-08-03 10:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-30 22:11 Ilya Leoshkevich via Gdb-patches
2022-05-30 22:11 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] gdb.perf/: Fix tcl_string_list_to_python_list {x} Ilya Leoshkevich via Gdb-patches
2022-05-30 22:11 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] gdb.perf/: Add binary_link_with_shlibs setting to GenPerfTest Ilya Leoshkevich via Gdb-patches
2022-05-30 22:11 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] gdb.perf/: Allow adjusting GenPerfTest compile options Ilya Leoshkevich via Gdb-patches
2022-05-30 22:11 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] gdb.base/: Introduce jit-protocol-util.h Ilya Leoshkevich via Gdb-patches
2022-05-30 22:11 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] gdb.base/: Introduce jit_compile_options Ilya Leoshkevich via Gdb-patches
2022-05-30 22:11 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] gdb.base/: Introduce n_jit_so_address Ilya Leoshkevich via Gdb-patches
2022-05-30 22:11 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] gdb.perf/: Add JIT performance test Ilya Leoshkevich via Gdb-patches
2022-06-22  8:48 ` [PING] [PATCH v2 0/7] " Ilya Leoshkevich via Gdb-patches
2022-08-03 10:52 ` Ilya Leoshkevich via Gdb-patches [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2303df1afed8c2a5f623bfcb2c0e5167ce2d5b2e.camel@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=aburgess@redhat.com \
    --cc=arnez@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=iii@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=pedro@palves.net \
    --cc=tromey@adacore.com \
    --cc=ulrich.weigand@de.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox