From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id 5J5LJszK918sHQAAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 07 Jan 2021 22:00:28 -0500 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 901A31E965; Thu, 7 Jan 2021 22:00:28 -0500 (EST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8BB911E940 for ; Thu, 7 Jan 2021 22:00:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B5563850401; Fri, 8 Jan 2021 03:00:26 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 8B5563850401 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1610074826; bh=njKVhDi8KtxNXP3XsvH5rb/dzypIXtbqqclvM4x+7V0=; h=Subject:To:References:Date:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To: From; b=jMDy+9SqX3U50ZSlFsvd/cBEU046FIY3vlfbShC7EZqajw4jZIN5YB9ZBjyEjMF9F toFydIFSHjmHdJKpges4f7gsAmDVoLIrfLKNCbGGlGVfDzi2NJyMcUen/lOO0xHlzC uhAmldba3vXwYNQmNVPPGE2nyjz4cJfvIKvlXKGs= Received: from smtp.polymtl.ca (smtp.polymtl.ca [132.207.4.11]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ADA743850401 for ; Fri, 8 Jan 2021 03:00:23 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org ADA743850401 Received: from simark.ca (simark.ca [158.69.221.121]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.polymtl.ca (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 10830FxX016336 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 7 Jan 2021 22:00:20 -0500 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp.polymtl.ca 10830FxX016336 Received: from [10.0.0.213] (192-222-157-6.qc.cable.ebox.net [192.222.157.6]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 35BCC1E940; Thu, 7 Jan 2021 22:00:15 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: [PATCH] gdb: better handling of 'S' packets To: Pedro Alves , Andrew Burgess , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20201111153548.1364526-1-andrew.burgess@embecosm.com> Message-ID: <22799d1d-7713-7ab5-f029-d914eafbf624@polymtl.ca> Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2021 22:00:14 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Poly-FromMTA: (simark.ca [158.69.221.121]) at Fri, 8 Jan 2021 03:00:15 +0000 X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches Reply-To: Simon Marchi Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb-patches" Hi Pedro, It looks like you reviewed v1, but Andrew had posted v2: https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2020-December/174277.html I don't know if that was on purpose. On 2021-01-07 7:51 p.m., Pedro Alves wrote: > I'll look at Simon's patch next, and your thread/frame patches after. > Hopefully tomorrow. I adapted Andrew's v2 to work on top of my patch that makes the remote target track the threads' resume state, and so far it looks good (Andrew's test still passes). I'll give it a test run and send a combined series. Simon