Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Simon Marchi <simark@simark.ca>
To: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
Subject: Re: GDB 10 branching - 2020-06-27 Update
Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2020 11:15:02 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2239ac85-0c74-5be9-1489-a7a9830f0010@simark.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200703150654.GJ5340@adacore.com>

On 2020-07-03 11:06 a.m., Joel Brobecker wrote:
> I'll follow the group on that one. It's a risk vs reward situation:
> How risky is it for us to put the patch in just before the branch,
> versus how much do we expect to gain by having it now rather than
> in 6 months?  Given that this should only affect Guile support,
> I suppose the risk we are taking is limited to that part. If the risk
> is low and acceptable to everyone, then we can decide to have it
> in GDB 10. I'll put it on the list for now...

The patch is mostly adding new code guarded by #ifdefs based on the
Guile version.  So I think we can check and be reasonably confident
that the code effectively used when building against guile 2.0 won't
have changed much.  All the new code will be compiled out when
building against guile 2.0.  There may be bugs in the support for
guile 2.2/3.0 code, but that's a new feature, so it's better than
no support at all.

Simon


  reply	other threads:[~2020-07-03 15:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-27 15:40 Joel Brobecker
2020-07-01 21:11 ` Rainer Orth
2020-07-01 21:21   ` Joel Brobecker
2020-07-02 21:49 ` Simon Marchi
2020-07-03 15:10   ` Joel Brobecker
2020-07-03 15:12     ` Simon Marchi
2020-07-10 23:07       ` Pedro Alves
2020-07-03  0:35 ` Simon Marchi
2020-07-03  7:30   ` Eli Zaretskii
2020-07-03 15:06   ` Joel Brobecker
2020-07-03 15:15     ` Simon Marchi [this message]
2020-07-03  8:15 ` Sebastian Huber
2020-07-03 13:07   ` Andrew Burgess
2020-07-03 15:07     ` Joel Brobecker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2239ac85-0c74-5be9-1489-a7a9830f0010@simark.ca \
    --to=simark@simark.ca \
    --cc=brobecker@adacore.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=tom@tromey.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox