From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9382 invoked by alias); 29 Nov 2017 12:06:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 9372 invoked by uid 89); 29 Nov 2017 12:06:36 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KB_WAM_FROM_NAME_SINGLEWORD,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 12:06:35 +0000 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7EE9CC058EB0; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 12:06:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn04.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.4]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB4CC600D5; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 12:06:33 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [PATCH, gdb/testsuite] Fix wrong return type in tests To: Thomas Preudhomme , GDB Patches References: <964a7f20-21f0-3e7f-a46a-6ef34cef046c@redhat.com> <0bde66e5-b4fe-7d63-66d7-4882855b03aa@foss.arm.com> From: Pedro Alves Message-ID: <222801b2-deb4-3855-af56-7417d134c547@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 12:06:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <0bde66e5-b4fe-7d63-66d7-4882855b03aa@foss.arm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2017-11/txt/msg00765.txt.bz2 On 11/29/2017 11:59 AM, Thomas Preudhomme wrote: > My apologize, I thought it couldn't be significant since it was not > returning anything. I didn't think about the impact on the prototype > itself. No worries. It was easy to miss. How about making it return 0 instead then? Yes please, go ahead and push such a fix in. Thanks, Pedro Alves