From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31650 invoked by alias); 19 Dec 2001 19:18:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 31399 invoked from network); 19 Dec 2001 19:17:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO cygnus.com) (205.180.230.5) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 19 Dec 2001 19:17:38 -0000 Received: from porcupine.cygnus.com (cse.cygnus.com [205.180.230.236]) by runyon.cygnus.com (8.8.7-cygnus/8.8.7) with ESMTP id LAA04344 for ; Wed, 19 Dec 2001 11:17:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from porcupine.cygnus.com (law@localhost) by porcupine.cygnus.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id fBJJH4122223; Wed, 19 Dec 2001 12:17:04 -0700 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.4 06/23/2000 with nmh-1.0.4 To: Andrew Cagney cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: infttrace vs add_thread Reply-To: law@redhat.com From: law@redhat.com In-reply-to: Your message of Wed, 19 Dec 2001 18:49:44 GMT. <3C20E148.4090201@cygnus.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2001 11:18:00 -0000 Message-ID: <22222.1008789423@porcupine.cygnus.com> X-SW-Source: 2001-12/txt/msg00475.txt.bz2 > > Again, since I'm no longer a GDB maintainer, I'll hold off installing the > > fix until approved by a GDB maintainer. > > > But you do have write after approval. Cleanups like this are considered > obvious. OK. I've been out of the GDB development process for a long time -- I don't want to step on any toes. Meaning I'll probably be a little over-conservative about this kind of stuff. jeff