From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22778 invoked by alias); 21 Nov 2006 21:32:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 22769 invoked by uid 22791); 21 Nov 2006 21:32:15 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp-vbr13.xs4all.nl (HELO smtp-vbr13.xs4all.nl) (194.109.24.33) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 21:32:06 +0000 Received: from webmail.xs4all.nl (dovemail1.xs4all.nl [194.109.26.3]) by smtp-vbr13.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kALLVX8E080735; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 22:31:33 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl) Received: from 82.92.89.47 (SquirrelMail authenticated user sibelius) by webmail.xs4all.nl with HTTP; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 22:31:34 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <21481.82.92.89.47.1164144694.squirrel@webmail.xs4all.nl> In-Reply-To: <200611212022.kALKMFEQ017751@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> References: <200611212022.kALKMFEQ017751@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 21:32:00 -0000 Subject: Re: [RFA][3/5] New port: Cell BE SPU (the port itself) From: "Mark Kettenis" To: "Ulrich Weigand" Cc: "Daniel Jacobowitz" , gdb-patches@sourceware.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-11/txt/msg00233.txt.bz2 > I've now also tried out yet another alternative approach, which avoids > the ptrace_ops_hack problem by supporting only the spu target again. > > It still cleanly separates out target vs. host files. However, it does > require a change to configure.ac to allow configure.host to specify that > a configuration should be treated as "native" even though host != target. > > This patch does work as well as the original one. Would this (or > something along those lines) also be acceptable? This looks fine to me. Thanks! Mark