From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6178 invoked by alias); 26 Jun 2002 18:46:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 6170 invoked from network); 26 Jun 2002 18:46:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO heimdall.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.17) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 26 Jun 2002 18:46:09 -0000 Received: from Zaretsky ([80.230.2.40]) by heimdall.inter.net.il (Mirapoint Messaging Server MOS 3.1.0.58-GA) with ESMTP id BNH26053; Wed, 26 Jun 2002 21:45:51 +0300 (IDT) Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 11:46:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: tromey@redhat.com Message-Id: <2110-Wed26Jun2002214426+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <87lm91evky.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> (message from Tom Tromey on 26 Jun 2002 12:36:13 -0600) Subject: Re: RFA: add_setshow_cmd_full Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <87lm91evky.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> X-SW-Source: 2002-06/txt/msg00544.txt.bz2 > From: Tom Tromey > Date: 26 Jun 2002 12:36:13 -0600 > > Assuming Andrew approves my most recent patch in this area, what do > you think of the appended documentation patch? It's okay, please commit it with the source patches. > In Java it is standard to extract special comments in the source and > use those to construct API documentation. I know a long time ago gdb > did this, but it was abandoned. Anyway, wouldn't it be simpler to > keep the docs up to date with something like this in place? I don't mind going back to keeping the docs with the sources.