From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23192 invoked by alias); 15 Jan 2003 07:48:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 23185 invoked from network); 15 Jan 2003 07:48:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO thor.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.11) by 209.249.29.67 with SMTP; 15 Jan 2003 07:48:38 -0000 Received: from zaretsky ([80.230.234.231]) by thor.inter.net.il (Mirapoint Messaging Server MOS 3.2.2-GA) with ESMTP id ASG63575; Wed, 15 Jan 2003 09:48:02 +0200 (IST) Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 07:48:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: fnasser@redhat.com Message-Id: <2110-Wed15Jan2003094645+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il> CC: ezannoni@redhat.com, mec@shout.net, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <3E248AF5.7070305@redhat.com> (message from Fernando Nasser on Tue, 14 Jan 2003 17:11:01 -0500) Subject: Re: [RFC/RFA] New 'to' command Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <200301142113.h0ELDgN08815@duracef.shout.net> <15908.32619.688026.129488@localhost.redhat.com> <3E248AF5.7070305@redhat.com> X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg00551.txt.bz2 > Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 17:11:01 -0500 > From: Fernando Nasser > > That was quick. I was afraid I had started another long long thread :-) Come on now, we all know that there's nothing like one of Fernando's good ideas to solve a problem and end a prolonged discussion ;-)