From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24104 invoked by alias); 16 Dec 2002 18:38:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 24095 invoked from network); 16 Dec 2002 18:38:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO gandalf.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.22) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 16 Dec 2002 18:38:28 -0000 Received: from zaretsky (adsl-ayalon-pc-129-251.inter.net.il [213.8.129.251]) by gandalf.inter.net.il (Mirapoint Messaging Server MOS 3.2.1-GA) with ESMTP id AAJ15147; Mon, 16 Dec 2002 20:38:20 +0200 (IST) Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2002 10:43:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: mludvig@suse.cz Message-Id: <2110-Mon16Dec2002203649+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il> CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <3DFD9516.7060705@suse.cz> (message from Michal Ludvig on Mon, 16 Dec 2002 09:55:50 +0100) Subject: Re: [RFA] Added verbosity to dwarf2* Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <3DFD9516.7060705@suse.cz> X-SW-Source: 2002-12/txt/msg00494.txt.bz2 > Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2002 09:55:50 +0100 > From: Michal Ludvig > > > > Wouldn't it be better to say "[in module %s]"? I'm afraid a BFD file > > name alone won't explain enough to the user. After all, not everyone who > > uses GDB knows all the module names in their program by heart. > > Well, why not. Anyway if an error or warning like this happens, it's > usually a GCC or GDB problem, not a user-level mistake. But it's more > descriptive, I agree. > > So can I commit it in this form? Fine with me, but I don't think I can approve patches to the DWARF2 reader.