Re: Regressions with dwz [Re: [RFA] Work around binutils/15021]

Jan Kratochvil
2013-01-24T19:08:19Z

On Thu, 24 Jan 2013 18:16:08 +0100, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Jan 2013 18:14:02 +0100, Doug Evans wrote:
> > Not sure I tested dwz with -m.
> > At any rate I get the same failures with a tree checked out with
> > -D2013-01-22 (i.e., before my patch).
>
> I get full PASS for ceb4ee95539d6324ca0f307ba729ea660ed5d1bd^ (see the
> trailing '^').

Correction: It was already broken just with the contrib/cc-with-tweaks.sh flag
"-m" (dwz).

But with "-m -i" (dwz together with .gdb_index) this commit regressed it.
("-m -i" is what gets exposed in Fedora packaging.)

Sure the "-m" issue is a bug, unaware now whether in dwz or in GDB (guessing
GDB).

Thanks,
Jan