From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-45724-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 17500 invoked by alias); 6 Oct 2006 10:53:57 -0000
Received: (qmail 17492 invoked by uid 22791); 6 Oct 2006 10:53:57 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from smtp-vbr4.xs4all.nl (HELO smtp-vbr4.xs4all.nl) (194.109.24.24)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 Oct 2006 10:53:52 +0000
Received: from webmail.xs4all.nl (dovemail7.xs4all.nl [194.109.26.9]) 	by smtp-vbr4.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id k96ArVve002679; 	Fri, 6 Oct 2006 12:53:36 +0200 (CEST) 	(envelope-from mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl)
Received: from 192.87.1.22         (SquirrelMail authenticated user sibelius)         by webmail.xs4all.nl with HTTP;         Fri, 6 Oct 2006 12:53:39 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <20713.192.87.1.22.1160132019.squirrel@webmail.xs4all.nl>
In-Reply-To: <1160084737.9761.89.camel@localhost.localdomain>
References: <1159223190.24808.52.camel@localhost.localdomain>     <1160084737.9761.89.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2006 10:53:00 -0000
Subject: Re: PING Re: [RFC] thread tests, linux/gdbserver
From: "Mark Kettenis" <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
To: "Michael Snyder" <Michael.Snyder@palmsource.com>
Cc: "GDB Patches ML" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>,         "Daniel Jacobowitz" <drow@false.org>
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.8
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2006-10/txt/msg00055.txt.bz2

>  Any objections to this patch?

Hmm, I must have missed the origional mail, but I think we should actually
fix our code to print these things in a more consistent manner.

>  On Mon, 2006-09-25 at 15:26 -0700, Michael Snyder wrote:
> > Several thread tests contain patterns that explicitly look
> > for the string "Thread" (capitalized) in the info threads
> > output.
> >
> > But target remote prints it as "thread" (lower case), and
> > so even though these tests can be run against gdbserver,
> > they will fail.
> >
> > This patch just substitutes a pattern "\[Tt\]hread".
> >
> > Seem OK?
> >
> >
>