From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16714 invoked by alias); 24 Aug 2012 16:54:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 16696 invoked by uid 22791); 24 Aug 2012 16:54:25 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,KHOP_RCVD_TRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-ey0-f201.google.com (HELO mail-ey0-f201.google.com) (209.85.215.201) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 16:54:12 +0000 Received: by eabm6 with SMTP id m6so98488eab.0 for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 09:54:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:date :to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:from :x-gm-message-state; bh=6cFJe7PpNk+s9/mDwm9CXXUX7wdmawl5V/O4ZvijOYk=; b=a20sXl37DvMscP8LKqiGrVZc+f7wlIdt6H5M7k7L0PGjTXs9eHsQKGvDWE64+WAlBg R6LhU/BvgyxMdErHj9TfOpZeQoejqxOgoCdVknsEhoLS4Svv8elf6RxWD/q0o08mdeOM CYQRufBuEpRNtqucTYGmlv+p+usPOOHVj69eowCzOXWYoemzhVLZ99kO2cMZd1oDRupG hFwqt4qOZIKjfRqNLjy/ZfVKb9NRon/X8XEY2lhrkDRCWS/PrGsrmoYYbetfkA/oy1mS 5a8sRsWpuwn0JA9Et4BuRQfxAr3F8YidlAAjGo83SzBaCHyxLDLKBsoHDkGnqYZEn0Y3 sk1Q== Received: by 10.180.105.2 with SMTP id gi2mr484796wib.4.1345827250841; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 09:54:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.180.105.2 with SMTP id gi2mr484791wib.4.1345827250806; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 09:54:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hpza9.eem.corp.google.com ([74.125.121.33]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e5si73957wiw.0.2012.08.24.09.54.10 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA); Fri, 24 Aug 2012 09:54:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ruffy2.mtv.corp.google.com (ruffy2.mtv.corp.google.com [172.18.110.129]) by hpza9.eem.corp.google.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD2175C0060; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 09:54:08 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <20535.45487.639469.141021@ruffy2.mtv.corp.google.com> Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 16:54:00 -0000 To: Jan Kratochvil Cc: Tom Tromey , gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: [patch] Implement $_version; for auto-load commands in ~/.gdbinit In-Reply-To: <20120824163856.GA11598@host2.jankratochvil.net> References: <20120821144916.GB28426@host2.jankratochvil.net> <87y5l6r8rz.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <20120824163215.GA11323@host2.jankratochvil.net> <20120824163856.GA11598@host2.jankratochvil.net> From: dje@google.com X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlLhElEP2m7GiktwjaVTkwvaA9OzpYmKLmFfRpioxnKkGDK9m7eTSDGwbX+Liz230auKGTuvmlkN6TDR1KGg+wnD9Z1qmidKQxVztrlqGinJtFQkA6kbjm2QiiuaHKzar9X51MybGpY4GBH/vSYd1hBED3d8LZGMQYQ2AIXkVK557f5tsGkGB1DqY4MxcxdpIOz9P3h86qn5gknnS0qav1PEUzGvg== X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-08/txt/msg00747.txt.bz2 Jan Kratochvil writes: > On Fri, 24 Aug 2012 18:32:15 +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > > Before writing it is there a consensus for example for ~/.gdbinit to use > > set $_ignore_errors=1 > > add-auto-load-safe-path ~/src > > set $_ignore_errors=0 > > ? > > Apparently that would not work. Probably either: > if $_have_ignore_errors > set ignore-errors yes > add-auto-load-safe-path ~/src > set ignore-errors no > end > or: > if $_have_ignore_errors > set $_ignore-errors=1 > add-auto-load-safe-path ~/src > set $_ignore-errors=0 > end > or: > if $_have_ignore_errors > ignore-errors > add-auto-load-safe-path ~/src > end > end For my own education, why is $_have_ignore_errors needed? [It doesn't, for example, evaluate to 0 if it doesn't exist.]