Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Doug Gilmore <Doug.Gilmore@imgtec.com>
To: Luis Machado <lgustavo@codesourcery.com>, <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [mips] Fix PR 21337 v1: segfault when re-reading symbols with remote debugging.
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 21:42:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20511c76-c816-d31d-5144-749eac9fc470@imgtec.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a869bc5c-a685-d9f1-1f28-aafcde8c3e1d@codesourcery.com>

On 04/12/2017 11:52 AM, Luis Machado wrote:
> On 03/31/2017 06:04 PM, Doug Gilmore wrote:
>> This is a fix to a problem that was introduced with commit g3e29f34.
>>
> 
> Which commit is that? I couldn't find it in the git tree.
$ git log -n 1 3e29f34 | head
commit 3e29f34a4eef29f5b159749ccb1efb8867b2e651
Author: Maciej W. Rozycki <macro@codesourcery.com>
Date:   Fri Dec 12 13:31:53 2014 +0000

    MIPS: Keep the ISA bit in compressed code addresses
    
    1. Background information
    
    The MIPS architecture, as originally designed and implemented in
    mid-1980s has a uniform instruction word size that is 4 bytes, naturally
$ 
> 
> Incidentally, i have a local patch that does pretty much the same
> thing, but a little further down compared to yours. It notifies gdb
> of objfile changes right before the call to read_symbols (...).
That location is fine too, I just put the call at the point that
the data actually becomes stale.
> 
> But my patch doesn't remove the original call to objfiles_changed
> (...). What is the rationale behind that change?
I removed it just because would always be an duplicate call.
> 
>> diff --git a/gdb/symfile.c b/gdb/symfile.c
>> index 8b79508..290b18b 100644
>> --- a/gdb/symfile.c
>> +++ b/gdb/symfile.c
>> @@ -2592,6 +2592,12 @@ reread_symbols (void)
>>        /* Free the obstacks for non-reusable objfiles.  */
>>        psymbol_bcache_free (objfile->psymbol_cache);
>>        objfile->psymbol_cache = psymbol_bcache_init ();
>> +
>> +      /* Notify objfiles that we've modified objfile sections, which now
>> +         needs to be done early to ensure that, for the MIPS target,
>> +         find_pc_section won't access stale data.  PR 21337.  */
> 
> I think the PR number is not needed. After all the bug will be gone with this fix.
Your right, people can just run "git log -p" to recover that information.

I'll update the patch accordingly.

Thanks,

Doug


  reply	other threads:[~2017-04-12 21:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-31 23:04 Doug Gilmore
2017-04-10 16:01 ` Doug Gilmore
2017-04-12 18:52 ` Luis Machado
2017-04-12 21:42   ` Doug Gilmore [this message]
2017-04-13 18:56     ` [PATCH] Fix PR 21337 v2: " Doug Gilmore
2017-04-14 15:33       ` Luis Machado
2017-04-22  2:15       ` Simon Marchi
2017-04-25 18:16         ` Doug Gilmore
2017-04-27 19:46           ` Simon Marchi
2017-04-28 23:44             ` Doug Gilmore
2017-04-29  1:13               ` Luis Machado
2017-04-29  1:42               ` Simon Marchi
2017-04-29 17:12                 ` Doug Gilmore
2017-04-29 23:26                   ` Simon Marchi
2017-04-30  5:14                     ` Doug Gilmore
2017-05-10 23:26                       ` Doug Gilmore
2017-05-12  3:29                         ` Simon Marchi
2017-05-12 19:24                           ` Doug Gilmore
2017-05-16 23:11                           ` [PATCH] Fix PR 21337 (v3): " Doug Gilmore
2017-06-06 16:08                             ` [PING][PATCH] " Doug Gilmore
2017-06-23 18:20                               ` [PING^2][PATCH] " Doug Gilmore
2017-06-25 11:25                             ` [PATCH] " Simon Marchi
2017-06-27 17:29                               ` [PATCH] Fix PR 21337 (v4): " Doug Gilmore
2017-06-27 21:35                                 ` Doug Gilmore
2017-06-28  2:01                                   ` Maciej W. Rozycki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20511c76-c816-d31d-5144-749eac9fc470@imgtec.com \
    --to=doug.gilmore@imgtec.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=lgustavo@codesourcery.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox