From: Christina Schimpe <christina.schimpe@intel.com>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Cc: tom@tromey.com, thiago.bauermann@linaro.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 06/12] gdb: Refactor 'find_symbol_funname' and 'info_frame_command_core' in stack.c.
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2026 12:31:27 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260706123133.1990441-7-christina.schimpe@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260706123133.1990441-1-christina.schimpe@intel.com>
To avoid code duplication, create a new function 'stack.c:find_symbol_funname',
which will be used in 'stack.c:find_frame_funname'. The function will also be
used in a following commit.
Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
---
gdb/stack.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gdb/stack.c b/gdb/stack.c
index 61cd73b8367..f5196c384fd 100644
--- a/gdb/stack.c
+++ b/gdb/stack.c
@@ -1211,6 +1211,33 @@ get_last_displayed_sal ()
return sal;
}
+/* Find the function name for the symbol SYM. */
+
+static gdb::unique_xmalloc_ptr<char>
+find_symbol_funname (const symbol *sym)
+{
+ gdb::unique_xmalloc_ptr<char> funname;
+ const char *print_name = sym->print_name ();
+
+ if (sym->language () == language_cplus)
+ {
+ /* It seems appropriate to use print_name () here,
+ to display the demangled name that we already have
+ stored in the symbol table, but we stored a version
+ with DMGL_PARAMS turned on, and here we don't want to
+ display parameters. So remove the parameters. */
+ funname = cp_remove_params (print_name);
+ }
+
+ if (funname == nullptr)
+ {
+ /* If we didn't hit the C++ case above, set *funname here. */
+ funname = make_unique_xstrdup (print_name);
+ }
+
+ return funname;
+}
+
/* Attempt to obtain the name, FUNLANG and optionally FUNCP of the function
corresponding to FRAME. */
@@ -1229,25 +1256,10 @@ find_frame_funname (const frame_info_ptr &frame, enum language *funlang,
func = get_frame_function (frame);
if (func)
{
- const char *print_name = func->print_name ();
-
*funlang = func->language ();
if (funcp)
*funcp = func;
- if (*funlang == language_cplus)
- {
- /* It seems appropriate to use print_name() here,
- to display the demangled name that we already have
- stored in the symbol table, but we stored a version
- with DMGL_PARAMS turned on, and here we don't want to
- display parameters. So remove the parameters. */
- funname = cp_remove_params (print_name);
- }
-
- /* If we didn't hit the C++ case above, set *funname
- here. */
- if (funname == NULL)
- funname = make_unique_xstrdup (print_name);
+ funname = find_symbol_funname (func);
}
else
{
--
2.34.1
Intel Deutschland GmbH
Registered Address: Dornacher Strasse 1, 85622 Feldkirchen, Germany
Tel: +49 89 991 430, www.intel.de
Managing Directors: Harry Demas, Jeffrey Schneiderman, Yin Chong Sorrell
Chairperson of the Supervisory Board: Nicole Lau
Registered Seat: Munich
Commercial Register: Amtsgericht Muenchen HRB 186928
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-06 12:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-06 12:31 [PATCH v3 00/12] Add new command to print the shadow stack backtrace Christina Schimpe
2026-07-06 12:31 ` [PATCH v3 01/12] gdb: Generalize handling of the shadow stack pointer Christina Schimpe
2026-07-06 12:31 ` [PATCH v3 02/12] aarch64: Implement gdbarch function top_addr_empty_shadow_stack Christina Schimpe
2026-07-06 12:31 ` [PATCH v3 03/12] gdb: Add get_main_func_start_pc to refactor frame.c:inside_main_func Christina Schimpe
2026-07-06 12:31 ` [PATCH v3 04/12] gdb: Refactor 'stack.c:print_frame' Christina Schimpe
2026-07-06 12:31 ` [PATCH v3 05/12] gdb: Introduce 'stack.c:print_pc' function without frame argument Christina Schimpe
2026-07-06 12:31 ` Christina Schimpe [this message]
2026-07-06 12:31 ` [PATCH v3 07/12] gdb: Refactor 'stack.c:print_frame_info' Christina Schimpe
2026-07-06 12:31 ` [PATCH v3 08/12] gdb: Add command option 'bt -shadow' to print the shadow stack backtrace Christina Schimpe
2026-07-08 9:13 ` Schimpe, Christina
2026-07-06 12:31 ` [PATCH v3 09/12] gdb: Implement the hook 'is_no_return_shadow_stack_address' for amd64 linux Christina Schimpe
2026-07-06 12:31 ` [PATCH v3 10/12] gdb: Enable inferior calls in the shadow stack backtrace Christina Schimpe
2026-07-06 12:31 ` [PATCH v3 11/12] gdb: Enable signal trampolines " Christina Schimpe
2026-07-06 12:31 ` [PATCH v3 12/12] gdb, mi: Add -shadow-stack-list-frames command Christina Schimpe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260706123133.1990441-7-christina.schimpe@intel.com \
--to=christina.schimpe@intel.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=thiago.bauermann@linaro.org \
--cc=tom@tromey.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox