From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id Qc7IAMWO5GmndikAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 19 Apr 2026 04:13:57 -0400 Authentication-Results: simark.ca; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=suse.de header.i=@suse.de header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=stQ2A+W0; dkim=pass header.d=suse.de header.i=@suse.de header.a=ed25519-sha256 header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b=E+s7+rNr; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=suse.de header.i=@suse.de header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=UpXNxdHD; dkim=neutral header.d=suse.de header.i=@suse.de header.a=ed25519-sha256 header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b=qCLhZO8i; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id F02FB1E0B1; Sun, 19 Apr 2026 04:13:56 -0400 (EDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.1 (2024-03-25) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=ARC_SIGNED,ARC_VALID,BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED,RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=4.0.1 Received: from vm01.sourceware.org (vm01.sourceware.org [38.145.34.32]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange x25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D3B5F1E093 for ; Sun, 19 Apr 2026 04:13:55 -0400 (EDT) Received: from vm01.sourceware.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 506404C318B0 for ; Sun, 19 Apr 2026 08:13:55 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 506404C318B0 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key, unprotected) header.d=suse.de header.i=@suse.de header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=stQ2A+W0; dkim=pass header.d=suse.de header.i=@suse.de header.a=ed25519-sha256 header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b=E+s7+rNr; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=suse.de header.i=@suse.de header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=UpXNxdHD; dkim=neutral header.d=suse.de header.i=@suse.de header.a=ed25519-sha256 header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b=qCLhZO8i Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de (smtp-out1.suse.de [195.135.223.130]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E8254C91748 for ; Sun, 19 Apr 2026 08:12:52 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 3E8254C91748 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=suse.de Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=suse.de ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 3E8254C91748 Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=195.135.223.130 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1776586372; cv=none; b=LLycPDu/KbWo/0lh/Bj1tXVGksdCaDjekPLgWHQfyk6FJj/p4DpSvL8UM4eJT1vtv6beVTUty9nsASzamn3JXX828sVWXlUR1tmHXPr7afEqnMTszBhVmID2dCb+V8FO1RBqFwbp8aOesbQ0tsddg3b0iS6aFEM/RXaFFrA5jMY= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1776586372; c=relaxed/simple; bh=WcrSCYM3sky7+FvxAm7sTQ7D6sTABvQJFWXwu6mMMjw=; h=DKIM-Signature:DKIM-Signature:DKIM-Signature:DKIM-Signature:From: To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=b+7J7o4W8UGEmENIsvL0fieMDjA6Lc5HQzFKZZwXMeJhkEHVwo6MAT0u9hks1WArR7E9LfN4cQ2BNDOYcBhYjw3ZQyiKFni6MujmFFYqbwaIF4yIr/LCWcrY+ZIih1yhrvrezIWKTNy1DtsW/bZQYLUnJGEN6BKLhPtKPAzG2Bc= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 3E8254C91748 Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org [IPv6:2a07:de40:b281:104:10:150:64:97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B370C6A93D for ; Sun, 19 Apr 2026 08:12:36 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_rsa; t=1776586358; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc: mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding; bh=BemRhMHOqy6MX+Kb781vaGGCJg4EiNAulzrIJpKnlv4=; b=stQ2A+W0nzZnNJITYqq7xcN/gII4PUsNLtDqK6G+TotDEcRhrQg/JihmAQWcN5p2GgMPqT A8ll12eyPdHo/J57bCy2R/hcyis6qQ8ZPx7eebxiao7AmKxwfXB1EBJJmgLqspXLXr9tMl 2DYwD3F5jv4Gh0ce92WlZlWEe24/stU= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1776586358; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc: mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding; bh=BemRhMHOqy6MX+Kb781vaGGCJg4EiNAulzrIJpKnlv4=; b=E+s7+rNrV1K/TaCreLRQ9og9bN4DmhRWvn4AiLNgXnPsKZyIqJx4eJW49areBsxuH2I/F8 qVuUdv/L7K6NSOCA== Authentication-Results: smtp-out1.suse.de; dkim=pass header.d=suse.de header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=UpXNxdHD; dkim=pass header.d=suse.de header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b=qCLhZO8i DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_rsa; t=1776586356; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc: mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding; bh=BemRhMHOqy6MX+Kb781vaGGCJg4EiNAulzrIJpKnlv4=; b=UpXNxdHD3Wo6mWqZVFLzCwvVKXGXZB7zdwQWhQ+rpo5xoXQP6nZTePqqNN7UU4FHKii1Nb Ua/lQOI/iLdkKBlhkPHNHbFtvOeDuf9rR7dgfmBQUXhUchc/jsYiV/RzVYjtURQqgpJcAf jRwaZOKqHq+a0xHARNLDLqMX+ixFqwE= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1776586356; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc: mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding; bh=BemRhMHOqy6MX+Kb781vaGGCJg4EiNAulzrIJpKnlv4=; b=qCLhZO8ibQNT/q8UPWubCNEev0IpT4HFR/CCEm6nl1GYtTDlPwJ+hyoVmOz+VG4QXcFjIA gqHQ0KcWyCA0f1BA== Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9BCDB593AE for ; Sun, 19 Apr 2026 08:12:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([2a07:de40:b281:106:10:150:64:167]) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org with ESMTPSA id 6DpqJHSO5GktUAAAD6G6ig (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 19 Apr 2026 08:12:36 +0000 From: Tom de Vries To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: [PATCH v5 0/3] [gdb/exp] Fix some namespace issues Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2026 10:12:33 +0200 Message-ID: <20260419081236.570600-1-tdevries@suse.de> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.51.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Rspamd-Action: no action X-Rspamd-Server: rspamd2.dmz-prg2.suse.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.01 / 50.00]; BAYES_HAM(-3.00)[100.00%]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MID_CONTAINS_FROM(1.00)[]; R_MISSING_CHARSET(0.50)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[suse.de:s=susede2_rsa,suse.de:s=susede2_ed25519]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.20)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; FUZZY_RATELIMITED(0.00)[rspamd.com]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[gdb-patches@sourceware.org]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; DBL_BLOCKED_OPENRESOLVER(0.00)[sourceware.org:url,imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org:helo,imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org:rdns,suse.de:dkim,suse.de:mid]; DKIM_SIGNED(0.00)[suse.de:s=susede2_rsa,suse.de:s=susede2_ed25519]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; SPAMHAUS_XBL(0.00)[2a07:de40:b281:104:10:150:64:97:from]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[suse.de:+] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: B370C6A93D X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces~public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Hafiz Abid Qadeer reported PR34034, a problem with namespace handling using a Fortran program. I wrote an equivalent program in C++, and reproduced the reported problem with both. While investigating the problem, I ran into another problem, for which I filed PR34051. This series contains three patches. The first patch refactors a complex assignment in cp_lookup_symbol_via_imports. The second patch fixes PR34051, in that same assignment. The third patch fixes PR34034. Tested on aarch64-linux. A v1 was submitted here [1]. Changes in v2 [2]: - updated type of directive_match to bool Changes in v3 [3]: - fixed top-level "return -1" in test-case - fixed typo in test-case Changes in v4 [4]: - don't use 1 to set bool - added approval tag to first patch - replaced "block->function () != nullptr" with "block->function_block () != nullptr" to handle the case that current block is not a function block, but nested in one - extended test-case to exercise nested block scenario Changes in v5: - add third patch to fix PR34034 - update description subject to reflect that we're fixing two PRs Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34034 Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34051 [1] v1 https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2026-April/226370.html [2] v2 https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2026-April/226375.html [3] v3 https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2026-April/226433.html [4] v4 https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2026-April/226488.html Tom de Vries (3): [gdb] Break up complex assignment in cp_lookup_symbol_via_imports [gdb/exp] Fix ignoring of incorrect namespace prefix [gdb/exp] Handle recursive namespace import gdb/cp-namespace.c | 36 +++++++++++---- gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/nsusing-2.cc | 62 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/nsusing-2.exp | 74 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 162 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) create mode 100644 gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/nsusing-2.cc create mode 100644 gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/nsusing-2.exp base-commit: 748464badd66456a014aa306501acf17bd73f485 -- 2.51.0