Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] [gdb/symtab] Tweak fix-up of truncated inline function block ranges
Date: Mon,  2 Mar 2026 12:48:49 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260302114849.1797017-4-tdevries@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260302114849.1797017-1-tdevries@suse.de>

Consider test-case gdb.cp/step-and-next-inline.exp on ppc64le-linux.

The corresponding source file step-and-next-inline.cc contains functions
tree_check and get_alias_set:
...
    35	#define TREE_TYPE(NODE) (*tree_check (NODE, 0))
    36
    37	inline tree *
    38	tree_check (tree *t, int i)
    39	{
    40	  if (t->x != i)
    41	    abort();
    42	  tree *x = t;
    43	  return x;
    44	}
    ...
    48	int __attribute__((noinline, noclone))
    49	get_alias_set (tree *t)
    50	{
    51	  if (t != NULL
    52	      && TREE_TYPE (t).z != 1
    53	      && TREE_TYPE (t).z != 2
    54	      && TREE_TYPE (t).z != 3)
    55	    return 0;
    56	  return 1;
    57	}
...
as well as a trivial function main calling get_alias_set.

Say we step into the first call to tree_check, and then step to the return
at line 43:
...
(gdb) s
tree_check (i=0, t=0x10020030 <xx>) at step-and-next-inline.cc:40
40	  if (t->x != i)
(gdb) s
43	  return x;
(gdb)
...

At that point, we have pc 0x1000071c:
...
(gdb) p $pc
$1 = (void (*)(void)) 0x1000071c <get_alias_set(tree*)+28>
(gdb)
...
and the backtrace looks like this:
...
 (gdb) bt
 #0  tree_check (i=<optimized out>, t=<optimized out>) at
       step-and-next-inline.cc:43
 #1  get_alias_set (t=t@entry=0x10020030 <xx>) at step-and-next-inline.cc:52
 #2  0x0000000010000560 in main () at step-and-next-inline.cc:64
 (gdb)
...
which shows all 3 functions.

This seems trivial, but it's not.

All three calls to tree_check are inlined, and the first call is represented
by:
...
 <2><877>: Abbrev Number: 40 (DW_TAG_inlined_subroutine)
    <878>   DW_AT_abstract_origin: <0x967>
    <87c>   DW_AT_entry_pc    : 0x10000710
    <884>   DW_AT_GNU_entry_view: 0
    <885>   DW_AT_ranges      : 0xc
    <88a>   DW_AT_call_line   : 52
...
with DW_AT_ranges referring to:
...
Contents of the .debug_rnglists section:

    Offset   Begin    End
    0000000c 0000000010000710 (base address)
    00000015 0000000010000710 000000001000071c
    00000018 000000001000077c 000000001000077c (start == end)
    0000001b 0000000010000788 0000000010000790
    0000001f <End of list>
...

The range at offset 0x15 is [0x10000710, 0x1000071c), so address 0x1000071c
does not fall in the range, and consequently the debug info does not consider
0x1000071c part of the inlined tree_check.

However, since commit 8efed40efd6 ("gdb: fix-up truncated inline function
block ranges"), gdb contains a fix in lnp_state_machine::record_line:
...
  if (m_address != m_last_address
      && m_stmt_at_address
      && m_cu->producer_is_gcc ()
      && (m_flags & LEF_IS_STMT) == 0)
    dwarf_find_and_extend_inline_block_range (m_cu, m_last_address,
                                              m_address, m_line);
...
that looks at the corresponding line number information:
...
File name                    Line number    Starting address    View    Stmt
step-and-next-inline.cc               42          0x1000071c               x
step-and-next-inline.cc               43          0x1000071c       1       x
step-and-next-inline.cc               43          0x1000071c       2
step-and-next-inline.cc               52          0x1000071c       3
step-and-next-inline.cc               52          0x10000720
...
and extends the range of the inlined tree_check to include
[0x1000071c, 0x10000720).

[ Please read the commit message of aforementioned commit to understand why
the fix is correct. ]

Let's look in more detail at how the call to
dwarf_find_and_extend_inline_block_range is activated for the fix.  It's
activated for the last entry (52/0x10000720), with:
- m_last_address == 0x1000071c,
- m_address == 0x10000720, and
- m_line == 52 (matching the DW_AT_call_line).

It's easy to see that for the last entry, (m_flags & LEF_IS_STMT) == 0 holds,
because it doesn't have an x in the "Stmt" column.

I found it less obvious that m_stmt_at_address also holds.

[ The documentation clarifies that this is related to m_last_address:
....
  /* Set to true when a previous line at the same address (using
     m_last_address) had LEF_IS_STMT set in m_flags.  This is reset to false
     when a line entry at a new address (m_address different to
     m_last_address) is processed.  */
  bool m_stmt_at_address = false;
...

To get maximum clarity, I checked the value for each entry:
...
address         m_stmt_at_address
---------------------------------
before          false
42/0x1000071c   false->true
43/0x1000071c/1 true
43/0x1000071c/2 true
52/0x1000071c/3 true
52/0x10000720   true->false
...

Again it's easy to relate the transitions for particular entries to the "Stmt"
column.

The tricky bit is that the transition takes place at the end of
lnp_state_machine::record_line, so while processing entry 52/0x10000720, we
sample m_stmt_at_address while it's still true. ]

Likewise, the fix works for the second inlined call.

But not for the third.  The debug info has the same problem, but the fix is
not applied.

The corresponding line info looks slightly different:
...
File name                    Line number    Starting address    View    Stmt
step-and-next-inline.cc               42          0x1000074c               x
step-and-next-inline.cc               43          0x1000074c       1       x
step-and-next-inline.cc               43          0x1000074c       2
step-and-next-inline.cc               54          0x1000074c       3
step-and-next-inline.cc               55          0x10000750
...

In this case, dwarf_find_and_extend_inline_block_range gets called with:
- m_last_address == 0x1000074c,
- m_address == 0x10000750, and
- m_line == 55,
but since line 55 doesn't match DW_AT_call_line 54:
...
 <2><918>: Abbrev Number: 44 (DW_TAG_inlined_subroutine)
    <919>   DW_AT_abstract_origin: <0x967>
    <91d>   DW_AT_entry_pc    : 0x10000740
    <925>   DW_AT_GNU_entry_view: 0
    <926>   DW_AT_low_pc      : 0x10000740
    <92e>   DW_AT_high_pc     : 0xc
    <937>   DW_AT_call_line   : 54
...
the fix is not applied.

I'm proposing the following simple tweak, to handle the third inlined call as
well: instead of using m_line, use m_last_line.

Tested on x86_64-linux and ppc64le-linux.

Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33930
---
 gdb/dwarf2/line-program.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/gdb/dwarf2/line-program.c b/gdb/dwarf2/line-program.c
index b9d93bb7b0e..5aa97ea3714 100644
--- a/gdb/dwarf2/line-program.c
+++ b/gdb/dwarf2/line-program.c
@@ -445,12 +445,25 @@ lnp_state_machine::record_line (bool end_sequence)
 		  (end_sequence ? "\t(end sequence)" : ""));
     }
 
+  /*  Activate dwarf_find_and_extend_inline_block_range for line number info:
+
+	Line number    Starting address	   View	   Stmt
+		 42	     0x1000074c		      x
+		 43	     0x1000074c	      1	      x
+		 43	     0x1000074c	      2
+		 54	     0x1000074c	      3
+		 55	     0x10000750
+
+      at entry 55/0x10000750 with:
+      - m_last_address == 0x1000074c
+      - m_address == 0x10000750
+      - m_last_line == 54.  */
   if (m_address != m_last_address
       && m_stmt_at_address
       && m_cu->producer_is_gcc ()
       && (m_flags & LEF_IS_STMT) == 0)
     dwarf_find_and_extend_inline_block_range (m_cu, m_last_address,
-					      m_address, m_line);
+					      m_address, m_last_line);
 
   file_entry *fe = current_file ();
 
-- 
2.51.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-03-02 11:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-02 11:48 [PATCH 0/3] " Tom de Vries
2026-03-02 11:48 ` [PATCH 1/3] [gdb/symtab] Rename lnp_state_machine::m_last_line to m_last_recorded_line Tom de Vries
2026-03-02 11:48 ` [PATCH 2/3] [gdb/symtab] Re-add lnp_state_machine::m_last_line Tom de Vries
2026-03-02 11:48 ` Tom de Vries [this message]
2026-03-10 16:05   ` [PATCH 3/3] [gdb/symtab] Tweak fix-up of truncated inline function block ranges Andrew Burgess
2026-03-10 20:34     ` Tom de Vries
2026-03-14 14:22       ` Andrew Burgess
2026-03-14 14:53         ` Tom de Vries
2026-03-11 13:24     ` Tom de Vries
2026-03-11 15:13       ` Tom de Vries
2026-03-12  6:45         ` Tom de Vries
2026-03-12 12:07           ` Tom de Vries
2026-03-19 15:39   ` Andrew Burgess
2026-04-20 14:38     ` Tom de Vries

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260302114849.1797017-4-tdevries@suse.de \
    --to=tdevries@suse.de \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox