From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id 8U1TI3C4lmmRGwEAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 19 Feb 2026 02:14:56 -0500 Authentication-Results: simark.ca; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=EWHmdhxy; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 89C2D1E0BA; Thu, 19 Feb 2026 02:14:56 -0500 (EST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.1 (2024-03-25) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.4 required=5.0 tests=ARC_SIGNED,ARC_VALID,BAYES_00, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED,RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=4.0.1 Received: from vm01.sourceware.org (vm01.sourceware.org [38.145.34.32]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange x25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 33F251E089 for ; Thu, 19 Feb 2026 02:14:55 -0500 (EST) Received: from vm01.sourceware.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAB644B9DB40 for ; Thu, 19 Feb 2026 07:14:48 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org AAB644B9DB40 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key, unprotected) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=EWHmdhxy Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC3FD4BA23D1 for ; Thu, 19 Feb 2026 07:14:22 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org CC3FD4BA23D1 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org CC3FD4BA23D1 Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=170.10.133.124 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1771485262; cv=none; b=UGy2AyVC44XiV4bGKSzEDg5EPCb7xHPFknJnx0Yx2CvFk/SHRuE+fzwBf/whk5DuQk0AR0VotAz/TkcejEhfXBHRbS6ap+v7OoiEfl8zyjmo6lshlEh8vhhJ87kEosF+SUafwl94sNmL7cnbEZeJxV9xtC4Fn+NnM4v0e5/jWno= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1771485262; c=relaxed/simple; bh=LSkocElEnjg18rFIASbhtAIktcHm+QcylhBkoNJoslk=; h=DKIM-Signature:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=ThJwDvZgdKSDb8r5Z4BGNxuLF7rC0YIfpYeDN00bg/MgDx84ksxOZwFV6vC4VkCLrTGsDV6uH/wrYsM6+/qK4bis6KIhmBTYTx8zQ2EZTnRV62HmAupPlFGG3ehSwkHRDrBe6UvwacCq7aHn3XeYSz3PdoketiyjUf1QpyMgpNA= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org CC3FD4BA23D1 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1771485262; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=/mv/QWPeYsClhpAP4O+IKuKk5tN1iysXcjCTD0omN0c=; b=EWHmdhxy427vcznFvTCPnMI8kh9kESJdGtQZjIPK+ZXnK3nwZMJ8jKHA05F5MSR1Blcikf xHZhlW1GZG9RRahI4jL3stUCjIFP1ocXFRrc3LIFp7x513NtZ1cpwKDnSbY2O6q0HdXP5a oq799wZfEusHsd55eN+3SefWlemnGZg= Received: from mx-prod-mc-01.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (ec2-54-186-198-63.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [54.186.198.63]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-138-kx0Ji7YOPUymuBIO843KAw-1; Thu, 19 Feb 2026 02:14:18 -0500 X-MC-Unique: kx0Ji7YOPUymuBIO843KAw-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: kx0Ji7YOPUymuBIO843KAw_1771485257 Received: from mx-prod-int-01.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (mx-prod-int-01.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com [10.30.177.4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx-prod-mc-01.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B8F51956094; Thu, 19 Feb 2026 07:14:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from f42-zbm-amd (unknown [10.22.80.38]) by mx-prod-int-01.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D820D3000C26; Thu, 19 Feb 2026 07:14:15 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2026 00:14:13 -0700 From: Kevin Buettner To: Tom Tromey Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, simon.marchi@polymtl.ca, Simon Marchi Subject: Re: [PATCH] gdb/solib-frv: remove manual memory management Message-ID: <20260219001413.336f3025@f42-zbm-amd> In-Reply-To: <87v7ft7vf1.fsf@tromey.com> References: <20260217211650.3999842-1-simon.marchi@polymtl.ca> <20260217163253.0a8f635e@f42-zbm-amd> <87v7ft7vf1.fsf@tromey.com> Organization: Red Hat MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.30.177.4 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-MFC-PROC-ID: uAZ8ngMiPV4uKgPGpiii7B5gJP6XoLld-GKsLrDQDlI_1771485257 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces~public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org On Wed, 18 Feb 2026 11:34:26 -0700 Tom Tromey wrote: > >>>>> "Kevin" == Kevin Buettner writes: > > >> I can only build-test this. > > Kevin> I haven't had access to an FR-V machine in a long, long time, so I > Kevin> can't properly test it either. > > Do you know whether they still exist and/or are relevant? > > I wonder if this is more obsolete code that we could remove. I don't know whether FR-V chips are still a available and/or in use. But I do know that the FDPIC shared library ABI has been used for other MMU-less linux architectures (including ARM) too. I think it might be a good idea to hang onto FDPIC support for a while longer. There's a somewhat recent write-up on these topics here: https://maskray.me/blog/2024-02-20-mmu-less-systems-and-fdpic Kevin