From: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [gdb/testsuite] Fix gdb.base/inline-frame-cycle-unwind.exp for s390x
Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2025 12:53:38 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251208125338.02cc248e@f41-zbm-amd> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251102044651.502973-1-kevinb@redhat.com>
Ping.
On Sat, 1 Nov 2025 21:46:51 -0700
Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com> wrote:
> This commit fixes six failures for s390x due to a fundamental
> difference in unwinding behavior between s390x and other
> architectures:
>
> FAIL: gdb.base/inline-frame-cycle-unwind.exp: bt: cycle at level 5:
> backtrace when the unwind is broken at frame 5
> FAIL: gdb.base/inline-frame-cycle-unwind.exp: bt: cycle at level 3:
> backtrace when the unwind is broken at frame 3
> FAIL: gdb.base/inline-frame-cycle-unwind.exp: bt: cycle at level 1:
> backtrace when the unwind is broken at frame 1
> FAIL: gdb.base/inline-frame-cycle-unwind.exp: bt -no-filters: cycle at level 5:
> backtrace when the unwind is broken at frame 5
> FAIL: gdb.base/inline-frame-cycle-unwind.exp: bt -no-filters: cycle at level 3:
> backtrace when the unwind is broken at frame 3
> FAIL: gdb.base/inline-frame-cycle-unwind.exp: bt -no-filters: cycle at level 1:
> backtrace when the unwind is broken at frame 1
>
> The core issue is that on s390x, the Canonical Frame Address (CFA) for
> a function points *into the caller's stack frame*, whereas on x86_64
> or aarch64 the CFA points *within the current function's frame*. This
> architectural difference causes cycle detection to occur later on
> s390x.
>
> The patch resolves this by:
> - Making expected backtrace output architecture-specific.
> - For non-s390x targets: expecting the full set of frames up to the
> specified level.
> - For s390x: expecting fewer frames before detecting the cycle
> (e.g., level 5 shows 3 frames instead of 5).
> - Skipping the cycle at level 1 test entirely on s390x since it cannot
> be detected at that frame.
>
> Tested using recent Fedora releases on s390x, x86_64, and aarch64.
> ---
> .../gdb.base/inline-frame-cycle-unwind.exp | 81 +++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 57 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/inline-frame-cycle-unwind.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/inline-frame-cycle-unwind.exp
> index 7fc47af624f..ccd86eb79ab 100644
> --- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/inline-frame-cycle-unwind.exp
> +++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/inline-frame-cycle-unwind.exp
> @@ -92,15 +92,31 @@ foreach bt_cmd { "bt" "bt -no-filters" } {
> gdb_test_no_output "python stop_at_level=5"
> gdb_test "maint flush register-cache" \
> "Register cache flushed\\."
> +
> + # Frames expected on all targets
> + set exp [list \
> + "#0 \[^\r\n\]* inline_func \\(\\) at \[^\r\n\]*" \
> + "#1 \[^\r\n\]* normal_func \\(\\) at \[^\r\n\]*" \
> + "#2 \[^\r\n\]* inline_func \\(\\) at \[^\r\n\]*" \
> + "#3 \[^\r\n\]* normal_func \\(\\) at \[^\r\n\]*"]
> +
> + # Additional frames required on non-s390x targets
> + if {![istarget "s390x*-*-*"]} {
> + lappend exp \
> + "#4 \[^\r\n\]* inline_func \\(\\) at \[^\r\n\]*" \
> + "#5 \[^\r\n\]* normal_func \\(\\) at \[^\r\n\]*"
> + }
> + #
> + # The final line that should appear for every target
> + lappend exp \
> + "Backtrace stopped: previous frame identical to this frame \\(corrupt stack\\?\\)"
> +
> + # Convert the list to the single string that gdb_test_lines expects.
> + # (This is equivalent to [multi_line {*}$exp]).
> + set expected [join $exp "\r\n"]
> +
> gdb_test_lines "$bt_cmd" "backtrace when the unwind is broken at frame 5" \
> - [multi_line \
> - "#0 \[^\r\n\]* inline_func \\(\\) at \[^\r\n\]+" \
> - "#1 \[^\r\n\]* normal_func \\(\\) at \[^\r\n\]+" \
> - "#2 \[^\r\n\]* inline_func \\(\\) at \[^\r\n\]+" \
> - "#3 \[^\r\n\]* normal_func \\(\\) at \[^\r\n\]+" \
> - "#4 \[^\r\n\]* inline_func \\(\\) at \[^\r\n\]+" \
> - "#5 \[^\r\n\]* normal_func \\(\\) at \[^\r\n\]+" \
> - "Backtrace stopped: previous frame identical to this frame \\(corrupt stack\\?\\)"]
> + $expected
> }
>
> with_test_prefix "cycle at level 3" {
> @@ -108,25 +124,42 @@ foreach bt_cmd { "bt" "bt -no-filters" } {
> gdb_test_no_output "python stop_at_level=3"
> gdb_test "maint flush register-cache" \
> "Register cache flushed\\."
> + # Frames expected on all targets
> + set exp [list \
> + "#0 \[^\r\n\]* inline_func \\(\\) at \[^\r\n\]*" \
> + "#1 \[^\r\n\]* normal_func \\(\\) at \[^\r\n\]*"]
> +
> + # Additional frames required on non-s390x targets
> + if {![istarget "s390x*-*-*"]} {
> + lappend exp \
> + "#2 \[^\r\n\]* inline_func \\(\\) at \[^\r\n\]*" \
> + "#3 \[^\r\n\]* normal_func \\(\\) at \[^\r\n\]*"
> + }
> + #
> + # The final line that should appear for every target
> + lappend exp \
> + "Backtrace stopped: previous frame identical to this frame \\(corrupt stack\\?\\)"
> +
> + # Convert the list to the single string that gdb_test_lines expects.
> + # (This is equivalent to [multi_line {*}$exp]).
> + set expected [join $exp "\r\n"]
> +
> gdb_test_lines "$bt_cmd" "backtrace when the unwind is broken at frame 3" \
> - [multi_line \
> - "#0 \[^\r\n\]* inline_func \\(\\) at \[^\r\n\]+" \
> - "#1 \[^\r\n\]* normal_func \\(\\) at \[^\r\n\]+" \
> - "#2 \[^\r\n\]* inline_func \\(\\) at \[^\r\n\]+" \
> - "#3 \[^\r\n\]* normal_func \\(\\) at \[^\r\n\]+" \
> - "Backtrace stopped: previous frame identical to this frame \\(corrupt stack\\?\\)"]
> + $expected
> }
>
> - with_test_prefix "cycle at level 1" {
> - # Arrange to introduce a stack cycle at frame 1.
> - gdb_test_no_output "python stop_at_level=1"
> - gdb_test "maint flush register-cache" \
> - "Register cache flushed\\."
> - gdb_test_lines "$bt_cmd" "backtrace when the unwind is broken at frame 1" \
> - [multi_line \
> - "#0 \[^\r\n\]* inline_func \\(\\) at \[^\r\n\]+" \
> - "#1 \[^\r\n\]* normal_func \\(\\) at \[^\r\n\]+" \
> - "Backtrace stopped: previous frame identical to this frame \\(corrupt stack\\?\\)"]
> + if {![istarget "s390x*-*-*"]} {
> + with_test_prefix "cycle at level 1" {
> + # Arrange to introduce a stack cycle at frame 1.
> + gdb_test_no_output "python stop_at_level=1"
> + gdb_test "maint flush register-cache" \
> + "Register cache flushed\\."
> + gdb_test_lines "$bt_cmd" "backtrace when the unwind is broken at frame 1" \
> + [multi_line \
> + "#0 \[^\r\n\]* inline_func \\(\\) at \[^\r\n\]+" \
> + "#1 \[^\r\n\]* normal_func \\(\\) at \[^\r\n\]+" \
> + "Backtrace stopped: previous frame identical to this frame \\(corrupt stack\\?\\)"]
> + }
> }
>
> # Flush the register cache (which also flushes the frame cache) so we
> --
> 2.51.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-08 19:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-02 4:46 Kevin Buettner
2025-12-08 19:53 ` Kevin Buettner [this message]
2025-12-09 19:53 ` Simon Marchi
2025-12-11 13:50 ` Tom de Vries
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251208125338.02cc248e@f41-zbm-amd \
--to=kevinb@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox