From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id lGoyFVOHk2j2UgUAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 06 Aug 2025 12:48:19 -0400 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 496A41E100; Wed, 6 Aug 2025 12:48:19 -0400 (EDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.1 (2024-03-25) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.0 required=5.0 tests=ARC_SIGNED,ARC_VALID,BAYES_00, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL,RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=4.0.1 Received: from server2.sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA42A1E091 for ; Wed, 6 Aug 2025 12:48:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B2BA3858C55 for ; Wed, 6 Aug 2025 16:48:18 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 3B2BA3858C55 Received: from joooj.vinc17.net (joooj.vinc17.net [IPv6:2001:4b99:1:3:216:3eff:fe20:ac98]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 823A23858D26 for ; Wed, 6 Aug 2025 16:47:50 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 823A23858D26 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=vinc17.net Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=vinc17.net ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 823A23858D26 Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=2001:4b99:1:3:216:3eff:fe20:ac98 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1754498870; cv=none; b=uF4PLDbu3pFvZ/KgVWJQ8GfUOpFqD6bXnizHfumvJnEtgeW3oDSc0ux/tyvc9GPUVzoE/WymtT2wAkKfnPHtGHiAv7WsK8UJDOvLdFcyk/0bBOnIYhgNp8rNxcG3WfUnUBuucckBeBhX+fntBjf2w4FKq7Ek38jzG2vbyNGParM= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1754498870; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ZYSGOLv2Pp0LIFmvFiKnJo8wAjxe1d8348nZtEgba1k=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=D/GRLJZ7DVIddRgS1Dv9FPYFb4mF73SJSYDbGDCb4DYGl8LSPWBVeSPtPbTx1J+OCw2i37uefV8NAQTS9rqf6ZT+1F3k55KDNu87t/sZObFpJKZCIrpElKenxUgngk8z8ignfhRFIZI2c1otGqWGFNE1WjtGS1hcgoAGzTtrtJs= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 823A23858D26 Received: from smtp-qaa.vinc17.net (135.197.67.86.rev.sfr.net [86.67.197.135]) by joooj.vinc17.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 40EDE483; Wed, 6 Aug 2025 18:47:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: by qaa.vinc17.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 8B4C4CA0386; Wed, 06 Aug 2025 18:47:48 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2025 18:47:48 +0200 From: Vincent Lefevre To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Provide papersize for refcard.dvi Message-ID: <20250806164748.GY2576@qaa.vinc17.org> References: <20250806145304.GA48050@cventin.lip.ens-lyon.fr> <86tt2ksbwm.fsf@gnu.org> <20250806160024.GD2248@cventin.lip.ens-lyon.fr> <86ldnws98j.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <86ldnws98j.fsf@gnu.org> X-Mailer-Info: https://www.vinc17.net/mutt/ User-Agent: Mutt/2.2.13+86 (bb2064ae) vl-169878 (2025-02-08) X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces~public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org On 2025-08-06 19:30:52 +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2025 18:00:24 +0200 > > From: Vincent Lefevre > > Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org > > > > On 2025-08-06 18:33:13 +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > Thanks, but we need to bring some TeX and DVI expert on board. I > > > wonder why GDB needs this whereas, for example, Emacs doesn't. Is > > > there something fundamentally wrong with the GDB refcard? > > > > That's strange, because I get exactly the same issue with Emacs. > > How come? I regularly produce refcard.pdf for Emacs, and never saw > any such problems. Do you perhaps have some unusual default > definition of paper size? PDF is different from DVI. -- Vincent Lefèvre - Web: 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / Pascaline project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)