From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id M4NJA+7WvGfBbzwAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2025 15:30:38 -0500 Authentication-Results: simark.ca; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=I/0N4oYX; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 034201E105; Mon, 24 Feb 2025 15:30:38 -0500 (EST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-13) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.4 required=5.0 tests=ARC_SIGNED,ARC_VALID,BAYES_00, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 Received: from server2.sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 992791E05C for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2025 15:30:37 -0500 (EST) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53E273858D35 for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2025 20:30:37 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 53E273858D35 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key, unprotected) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=I/0N4oYX Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C7293858C54 for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2025 20:29:51 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 5C7293858C54 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 5C7293858C54 Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=170.10.129.124 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1740428991; cv=none; b=MLNURxh1HUssAkfJg4qRUF3st5Cs+EF+mIQTK2pW8ISYX+6mc0IxcJhpKTfAyYuTEGSbuP2IBTjipstNpRpDzVRYTheHiuDxb+y0mnwjuvDZXUkJih24vn0BF0ga2NCvjHOI/bktHoVs7t1B19Lili3G1GvYUcx3U5CeQWDSm/k= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1740428991; c=relaxed/simple; bh=GRo57CwApYeqwwQ4ZwsM+CLdxn3r6foqDAuwCLT1tfc=; h=DKIM-Signature:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=MGww0EBL4ggAGazTxo4rRmNatuFjvcYY3ps5QClXpQaG7nMP9vTKhd/XIw8ncHZEKxBTKKo3QGDMZzchZ25mCZvNkOP83tzjT8gGflz4YJukJJvAeH3BtBQZHyQ0H8pYfbN7+iJNUla7ZJj00IOTTnX7beCd6OAYTq8fUQUQhlw= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 5C7293858C54 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1740428991; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=yaMAOErF+gslFfaAe4Jbe8jzAzYhmC47IGsm8+5jYB8=; b=I/0N4oYXBSbzq1YHk+u6D7z+c2+PEy9f304lZNxtEYTb2FRYSs/Ehb580AeEj+iTluQDuc pO728TZI03zM2LUk0gkKgm0zDR7taiSwAf6kFSk8m6skm6FGY/RPw16Ljq82ginOdmgV0/ wc3qTB5irY5c5BxgLmUtEtp5nsaviW0= Received: from mx-prod-mc-08.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (ec2-35-165-154-97.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [35.165.154.97]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-623-emlyXvbAMWWUuVwdQoTrUg-1; Mon, 24 Feb 2025 15:29:47 -0500 X-MC-Unique: emlyXvbAMWWUuVwdQoTrUg-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: emlyXvbAMWWUuVwdQoTrUg_1740428986 Received: from mx-prod-int-08.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (mx-prod-int-08.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com [10.30.177.111]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx-prod-mc-08.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C0AF61801A23; Mon, 24 Feb 2025 20:29:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from f41-zbm-amd (unknown [10.22.81.226]) by mx-prod-int-08.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E6ED8180035E; Mon, 24 Feb 2025 20:29:45 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2025 13:29:41 -0700 From: Kevin Buettner To: Tom Tromey Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/11] GDB-internal TLS support for Linux targets Message-ID: <20250224132941.7473517b@f41-zbm-amd> In-Reply-To: <87ikp38hsm.fsf@tromey.com> References: <20250131174747.921323-2-kevinb@redhat.com> <87ikp38hsm.fsf@tromey.com> Organization: Red Hat MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.30.177.111 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-MFC-PROC-ID: DOrsMlymeKldW7hwqwclnBM1XYr9w4G2b2JVBz2Yhuw_1740428986 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces~public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Hi Tom, On Fri, 21 Feb 2025 07:59:53 -0700 Tom Tromey wrote: > >>>>> "Kevin" == Kevin Buettner writes: > > Kevin> This series of commits adds internal TLS lookup support to GDB for the > Kevin> following Linux target architectures: x86_64, aarch64, ppc64, s390x, > Kevin> and riscv. When available, libthread_db support for TLS lookup is > Kevin> still preferred/used since it should be more accurate. This means > Kevin> that existing TLS support will still work as it did before - this new > Kevin> TLS support will only be used when libthread_db TLS support is not > Kevin> available. (Though it is possible to force internal TLS support to be > Kevin> used via a new maintenance command). > > Thanks for doing this. > I skimmed this series but didn't really review it in depth. > I think you should go ahead and check it in though. Thanks for looking over! I'll wait a week for objections, after which I'll push this series. Kevin