From: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>
To: Thiago Jung Bauermann <thiago.bauermann@linaro.org>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Luis Machado <luis.machado@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] gdb/testsuite: Add gdb.base/memops-watchpoint.exp
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2024 10:52:47 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240423105247.798dc561@f39-zbm-amd> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240422230700.1173173-3-thiago.bauermann@linaro.org>
On Mon, 22 Apr 2024 20:07:00 -0300
Thiago Jung Bauermann <thiago.bauermann@linaro.org> wrote:
> +set saw_watch_trigger 0
> +set saw_function 0
> +set is_supported 1
> +set message "continue until memcpy watchpoint hits"
> +set watch_trigger \
> + [multi_line \
> + "Continuing\\." \
> + "" \
> + "(Hardware w|W)atchpoint ${decimal}: -location b\\\[28\\\]" \
> + "" \
> + "Old value = 101 'e'" \
> + "New value = 114 'r'"]
> +gdb_test_multiple "continue" $message {
> + -re $watch_trigger {
> + set saw_watch_trigger 1
> + exp_continue
> + }
> + -re ".*memcpy.* \\(\\) at .*:$decimal\r\n" {
> + set saw_function 1
> + exp_continue
> + }
> + -re ".*memcpy.* \\(\\) from .*libc\[^\r\n\]+\r\n" {
> + set saw_function 1
> + exp_continue
> + }
> + -re "in \\?\\? \\(\\) from .*libc\[^\r\n\]+\r\n" {
> + set is_supported 0
> + unsupported "symbol for memcpy not found"
> + exp_continue
> + }
> + -re "$gdb_prompt $" {
> + if { $is_supported } {
> + setup_kfail breakpoints/31665 arm*-*-linux*
> + gdb_assert { $saw_watch_trigger && $saw_function } $message
> + }
> + }
> +}
For this test, on Fedora 39 x86_64 without glibc debuginfo, I see:
continue
Continuing.
Hardware watchpoint 3: -location b[28]
Old value = 101 'e'
New value = 114 'r'
0x00007ffff7e34b19 in __memmove_avx_unaligned () from /lib64/libc.so.6
(gdb) FAIL: gdb.base/memops-watchpoint.exp: continue until memcpy watchpoint hits
When I run it on Fedora 39 x86_64 w/ glibc debuginfo, I see the expected PASS:
continue
Continuing.
Hardware watchpoint 3: -location b[28]
Old value = 101 'e'
New value = 114 'r'
__memcpy_avx_unaligned () at ../sysdeps/x86_64/multiarch/memmove-vec-unaligned-erms.S:226
226 VMOVU %VMM(1), -VEC_SIZE(%rdi,%rdx)
(gdb) PASS: gdb.base/memops-watchpoint.exp: continue until memcpy watchpoint hits
I think you can fix the FAIL for the no-glibc-debuginfo case by
tweaking the RE in the same way that you did for the memmove test.
I also have Fedora 39 (Asahi Remix) running on an M1 macbook. When
I try this test on that machine, I see some timeouts...
(gdb) watch -location a[28]
Hardware watchpoint 2: -location a[28]
(gdb) PASS: gdb.base/memops-watchpoint.exp: set watch on a
watch -location b[28]
Hardware watchpoint 3: -location b[28]
(gdb) PASS: gdb.base/memops-watchpoint.exp: set watchpoint on b
watch -location c[28]
Hardware watchpoint 4: -location c[28]
(gdb) PASS: gdb.base/memops-watchpoint.exp: set watchpoint on c
continue
Continuing.
Hardware watchpoint 2: -location a[28]
Old value = 104 'h'
New value = 0 '\000'
__GI___memset_generic () at ../sysdeps/aarch64/memset.S:67
67 tbz count, 5, 1f
(gdb) PASS: gdb.base/memops-watchpoint.exp: continue until memset watchpoint hits
continue
Continuing.
FAIL: gdb.base/memops-watchpoint.exp: continue until memcpy watchpoint hits (timeout)
continue
FAIL: gdb.base/memops-watchpoint.exp: continue until memmove watchpoint hits (timeout)
testcase /ironwood1/sourceware-git/macbook-review/bld/../../worktree-review/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/memops-watchpoint.exp completed in 20 seconds
=== gdb Summary ===
# of expected passes 4
# of unexpected failures 2
Is this demonstrating the bug (31484) ?
Kevin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-23 17:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-22 23:06 [PATCH v3 0/2] Add testcase for libc memory operations Thiago Jung Bauermann
2024-04-22 23:06 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] gdb/testsuite: Add libc_has_debug_info require helper Thiago Jung Bauermann
2024-04-23 17:09 ` Kevin Buettner
2024-04-24 16:25 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2024-04-25 19:39 ` Bernd Edlinger
2024-04-26 3:00 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2024-04-26 5:06 ` Bernd Edlinger
2024-04-26 16:35 ` Pedro Alves
2024-04-26 17:18 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2024-04-30 1:57 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2024-04-22 23:07 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] gdb/testsuite: Add gdb.base/memops-watchpoint.exp Thiago Jung Bauermann
2024-04-23 17:52 ` Kevin Buettner [this message]
2024-04-24 17:05 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2024-04-24 23:22 ` Kevin Buettner
2024-04-26 1:42 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240423105247.798dc561@f39-zbm-amd \
--to=kevinb@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=luis.machado@arm.com \
--cc=thiago.bauermann@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox