Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>
To: Thiago Jung Bauermann <thiago.bauermann@linaro.org>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Luis Machado <luis.machado@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] gdb/testsuite: Add gdb.base/memops-watchpoint.exp
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2024 10:52:47 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240423105247.798dc561@f39-zbm-amd> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240422230700.1173173-3-thiago.bauermann@linaro.org>

On Mon, 22 Apr 2024 20:07:00 -0300
Thiago Jung Bauermann <thiago.bauermann@linaro.org> wrote:

> +set saw_watch_trigger 0
> +set saw_function 0
> +set is_supported 1
> +set message "continue until memcpy watchpoint hits"
> +set watch_trigger \
> +	[multi_line \
> +	     "Continuing\\." \
> +	     "" \
> +	     "(Hardware w|W)atchpoint ${decimal}: -location b\\\[28\\\]" \
> +	     "" \
> +	     "Old value = 101 'e'" \
> +	     "New value = 114 'r'"]
> +gdb_test_multiple "continue" $message {
> +    -re $watch_trigger {
> +	set saw_watch_trigger 1
> +	exp_continue
> +    }
> +    -re ".*memcpy.* \\(\\) at .*:$decimal\r\n" {
> +	set saw_function 1
> +	exp_continue
> +    }
> +    -re ".*memcpy.* \\(\\) from .*libc\[^\r\n\]+\r\n" {
> +	set saw_function 1
> +	exp_continue
> +    }
> +    -re "in \\?\\? \\(\\) from .*libc\[^\r\n\]+\r\n" {
> +	set is_supported 0
> +	unsupported "symbol for memcpy not found"
> +	exp_continue
> +    }
> +    -re "$gdb_prompt $" {
> +	if { $is_supported } {
> +	    setup_kfail breakpoints/31665 arm*-*-linux*
> +	    gdb_assert { $saw_watch_trigger && $saw_function } $message
> +	}
> +    }
> +}

For this test, on Fedora 39 x86_64 without glibc debuginfo, I see:

    continue
    Continuing.

    Hardware watchpoint 3: -location b[28]

    Old value = 101 'e'
    New value = 114 'r'
    0x00007ffff7e34b19 in __memmove_avx_unaligned () from /lib64/libc.so.6
    (gdb) FAIL: gdb.base/memops-watchpoint.exp: continue until memcpy watchpoint hits


When I run it on Fedora 39 x86_64 w/ glibc debuginfo, I see the expected PASS:

    continue
    Continuing.

    Hardware watchpoint 3: -location b[28]

    Old value = 101 'e'
    New value = 114 'r'
    __memcpy_avx_unaligned () at ../sysdeps/x86_64/multiarch/memmove-vec-unaligned-erms.S:226
    226		VMOVU	%VMM(1), -VEC_SIZE(%rdi,%rdx)
    (gdb) PASS: gdb.base/memops-watchpoint.exp: continue until memcpy watchpoint hits

I think you can fix the FAIL for the no-glibc-debuginfo case by
tweaking the RE in the same way that you did for the memmove test.

I also have Fedora 39 (Asahi Remix) running on an M1 macbook.  When
I try this test on that machine, I see some timeouts...

    (gdb) watch -location a[28]
    Hardware watchpoint 2: -location a[28]
    (gdb) PASS: gdb.base/memops-watchpoint.exp: set watch on a
    watch -location b[28]
    Hardware watchpoint 3: -location b[28]
    (gdb) PASS: gdb.base/memops-watchpoint.exp: set watchpoint on b
    watch -location c[28]
    Hardware watchpoint 4: -location c[28]
    (gdb) PASS: gdb.base/memops-watchpoint.exp: set watchpoint on c
    continue
    Continuing.

    Hardware watchpoint 2: -location a[28]

    Old value = 104 'h'
    New value = 0 '\000'
    __GI___memset_generic () at ../sysdeps/aarch64/memset.S:67
    67		tbz	count, 5, 1f
    (gdb) PASS: gdb.base/memops-watchpoint.exp: continue until memset watchpoint hits
    continue
    Continuing.
    FAIL: gdb.base/memops-watchpoint.exp: continue until memcpy watchpoint hits (timeout)
    continue
    FAIL: gdb.base/memops-watchpoint.exp: continue until memmove watchpoint hits (timeout)
    testcase /ironwood1/sourceware-git/macbook-review/bld/../../worktree-review/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/memops-watchpoint.exp completed in 20 seconds

		    === gdb Summary ===

    # of expected passes		4
    # of unexpected failures	2

Is this demonstrating the bug (31484) ?

Kevin


  reply	other threads:[~2024-04-23 17:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-22 23:06 [PATCH v3 0/2] Add testcase for libc memory operations Thiago Jung Bauermann
2024-04-22 23:06 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] gdb/testsuite: Add libc_has_debug_info require helper Thiago Jung Bauermann
2024-04-23 17:09   ` Kevin Buettner
2024-04-24 16:25     ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2024-04-25 19:39       ` Bernd Edlinger
2024-04-26  3:00         ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2024-04-26  5:06           ` Bernd Edlinger
2024-04-26 16:35           ` Pedro Alves
2024-04-26 17:18             ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2024-04-30  1:57               ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2024-04-22 23:07 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] gdb/testsuite: Add gdb.base/memops-watchpoint.exp Thiago Jung Bauermann
2024-04-23 17:52   ` Kevin Buettner [this message]
2024-04-24 17:05     ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2024-04-24 23:22       ` Kevin Buettner
2024-04-26  1:42         ` Thiago Jung Bauermann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240423105247.798dc561@f39-zbm-amd \
    --to=kevinb@redhat.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=luis.machado@arm.com \
    --cc=thiago.bauermann@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox