Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>
To: Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] [gdb] Fix "value is not available" with debug frame
Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2024 21:09:47 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240217210947.20211db0@f39-zbm-amd> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240213171718.8934-1-tdevries@suse.de>

Hi Tom,

On Tue, 13 Feb 2024 18:17:18 +0100
Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de> wrote:

> On arm-linux, with a started hello world, running "info frame" works fine, but
> when I set debug frame to on, I run into:
> ...
> (gdb) info frame
>   ...
> [frame] frame_unwind_register_value: exit
> value is not available
> (gdb)
> ...
> 
> The problem is here in frame_unwind_register_value:
> ...
>           if (value->lazy ())
>             gdb_printf (&debug_file, " lazy");
>           else
>             {
>               int i;
>               gdb::array_view<const gdb_byte> buf = value->contents ();
> ...
> where we call value->contents () while !value->entirely_available ().
> 
> Fix this by checking value->entirely_available () and printing:
> ...
>     [frame] frame_unwind_register_value:   -> register=91 unavailable
> ...
> 
> Tested on arm-linux.

The fix looks good to me.

I'm wondering about the test case though.  Is it the case that the
failure depends on debug info from a particular compiler (or compiler
version)?  If so, would it be possible to devise a test using the
DWARF assembler which would not be dependent on compiler output that
may change over time?

Kevin


  reply	other threads:[~2024-02-18  4:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-13 17:17 Tom de Vries
2024-02-18  4:09 ` Kevin Buettner [this message]
2024-02-18 13:30   ` Tom de Vries
2024-02-26 14:34     ` Tom de Vries
2024-02-26 22:34     ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2024-02-26 22:41       ` Simon Marchi
2024-02-27 16:19         ` Tom de Vries
2024-03-04 15:25     ` Luis Machado
2024-03-04 15:59       ` Tom de Vries

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240217210947.20211db0@f39-zbm-amd \
    --to=kevinb@redhat.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=tdevries@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox