From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id yA8kNkEd6WLaEx8AWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 02 Aug 2022 08:49:05 -0400 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id DB6CC1EA05; Tue, 2 Aug 2022 08:49:05 -0400 (EDT) Authentication-Results: simark.ca; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; secure) header.d=sourceware.org header.i=@sourceware.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=r+uk1RUY; dkim-atps=neutral X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RDNS_DYNAMIC,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from sourceware.org (ip-8-43-85-97.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 929911EA03 for ; Tue, 2 Aug 2022 08:49:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44397384B0EA for ; Tue, 2 Aug 2022 12:49:05 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 44397384B0EA DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1659444545; bh=An05GqeRyP7s+9ctFgqV8L25zc+HzUu5LFqEki8zjE4=; h=To:Subject:Date:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post: List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc:From; b=r+uk1RUYZawU0bfRPVN5Rzdu8ACPGHqggktI93hYuqEdlhnXpgx1CxHNVhfZ63BST UNv5rwNIXpyzSJa9K4SiwotIyo8sVWKzHkN8hgg8KbKeZRZ+2MzMYU88BsoccuC+Ez b8FOvGKB2qkSsS8mEuNJ8DUIcT37gPklTDVITcGY= Received: from lndn.lancelotsix.com (vps-42846194.vps.ovh.net [IPv6:2001:41d0:801:2000::2400]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E930385AE4F for ; Tue, 2 Aug 2022 12:47:47 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 8E930385AE4F Received: from octopus.. (unknown [IPv6:2a01:e0a:535:2750:1299:7061:a63:c92]) by lndn.lancelotsix.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AA71887F3A; Tue, 2 Aug 2022 12:47:45 +0000 (UTC) To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: [PATCH 0/2] Fix regressions in varobj recreation Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2022 13:47:22 +0100 Message-Id: <20220802124724.284096-1-lancelot.six@amd.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.11 (lndn.lancelotsix.com [0.0.0.0]); Tue, 02 Aug 2022 12:47:45 +0000 (UTC) X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Lancelot SIX via Gdb-patches Reply-To: Lancelot SIX Cc: lsix@lancelotsix.com, Lancelot SIX Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces+public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb-patches" Hi, Tom de Vries noticed that a series I merged recently (https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2022-July/191085.html) introduced regressions on some systems (reported in PR/29426). This series aims at fixing those issues. Patch #2 of the series is mostly about relaxing the testcase as I do not see a way to "fix" the actual divergence of behavior of the tescase when debugging PIE/non-PIE executable (see patch's description). Alternative approaches are more than welcome. Best, Lancelot. Lancelot SIX (2): gdb: Fix regression in varobj recreation gdb/testsuite: Accept PIE/noPIE programs in gdb.mi/mi-var-invalidate-shlib.exp gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/mi-var-invalidate-shlib.exp | 2 +- gdb/varobj.c | 9 +++++++-- 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) base-commit: 976f16630b1f7421d6693011333cf0f51417c498 -- 2.34.1