From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id qbBMCezztWINfgUAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2022 13:27:08 -0400 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 0F1EC1E22C; Fri, 24 Jun 2022 13:27:08 -0400 (EDT) Authentication-Results: simark.ca; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; secure) header.d=sourceware.org header.i=@sourceware.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=AL+RLFH+; dkim-atps=neutral X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A50991E22A for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2022 13:27:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3BBF3851AA2 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2022 17:27:06 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org C3BBF3851AA2 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1656091626; bh=GipIT4kCtD11Pd08obkIycleWQXMN+7u5ltPEJwGtms=; h=Date:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To: From; b=AL+RLFH+XuB+/khnEshQB4Yun9K1wpxTs2ue+VM3+rji2QWSQ8s8TA/X5hL/djEVY yzGLpQbiWWy5NtxbsIbO6GczVQC5dlqRpUK9P6xryUNtM/BK7lyWZekQynT05g6xSt DFYFpxhbiqIm2ksNkVsDmxOHdMRkonZWuqAvaa3k= Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6243C385AE53 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2022 17:26:48 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 6243C385AE53 Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mx3-rdu2.redhat.com [66.187.233.73]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-418-IjSi3J5cPbeEgQBt4jWqdA-1; Fri, 24 Jun 2022 13:26:46 -0400 X-MC-Unique: IjSi3J5cPbeEgQBt4jWqdA-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 752623804076; Fri, 24 Jun 2022 17:26:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from f35-zws-1 (unknown [10.2.16.89]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C8521121314; Fri, 24 Jun 2022 17:26:46 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2022 10:26:44 -0700 To: Markus Metzger via Gdb-patches Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 08/15] gdb, ada: collect standard exceptions in all objfiles Message-ID: <20220624102644.52901c2e@f35-zws-1> In-Reply-To: <20220602132514.957983-9-markus.t.metzger@intel.com> References: <20220602132514.957983-1-markus.t.metzger@intel.com> <20220602132514.957983-9-markus.t.metzger@intel.com> Organization: Red Hat MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.78 on 10.11.54.3 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Kevin Buettner via Gdb-patches Reply-To: Kevin Buettner Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces+public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb-patches" On Thu, 2 Jun 2022 15:25:07 +0200 Markus Metzger via Gdb-patches wrote: > When searching for standard exceptions for Ada, we lookup the minimal > symbol of each exception. With linker namespaces there can be multiple > instances in different namespaces. Collect them all. > --- > gdb/ada-lang.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++------- > 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) I'm not an Ada expert, but this seems reasonable. Kevin