From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id YK3nMk0qKWJzdQAAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 09 Mar 2022 17:29:33 -0500 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id CE6301F3CA; Wed, 9 Mar 2022 17:29:33 -0500 (EST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6ED881EA69 for ; Wed, 9 Mar 2022 17:29:33 -0500 (EST) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BB423858434 for ; Wed, 9 Mar 2022 22:29:32 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 7BB423858434 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1646864972; bh=AK1yzbXlMvS+1Rua6iknmA+ffzXOoj/pUrQMlz8GFgc=; h=Date:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc: From; b=R5b0bkdTjWWWH0aFsUSFccsB+llItwlY7fbTLUjN1VBSg089k3Cs0NN/kye/ddlw4 eU7wIwk9elQaDA5uXL8Td3OiJfytFJqT6Blyg55eCVZcYjflDy2110nhTU+KTYTKsN KVaHyDKhQ2pDtSPu8TtuVeaBnyf3Z2+mhwROZLkk= Received: from lndn.lancelotsix.com (vps-42846194.vps.ovh.net [IPv6:2001:41d0:801:2000::2400]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CCBAB3858C74 for ; Wed, 9 Mar 2022 22:29:12 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org CCBAB3858C74 Received: from Plymouth (unknown [IPv6:2a02:390:9086:0:7955:7ef5:70af:a502]) by lndn.lancelotsix.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6F4FE81859; Wed, 9 Mar 2022 22:29:11 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2022 22:29:06 +0000 To: Pedro Alves Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/11] Ensure EXIT is last event, gdb/linux Message-ID: <20220309222906.c4twjzet6w6pkvuc@Plymouth> References: <20220303144020.3601082-1-pedro@palves.net> <20220303144020.3601082-10-pedro@palves.net> <308a1654-45a3-3886-0094-eff4300c15a8@simark.ca> <20220309002120.bbmp67zkiiwk4hpr@Plymouth> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.11 (lndn.lancelotsix.com [0.0.0.0]); Wed, 09 Mar 2022 22:29:11 +0000 (UTC) X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Lancelot SIX via Gdb-patches Reply-To: Lancelot SIX Cc: Simon Marchi , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces+public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb-patches" > > So overall, I'm thinking of dropping this patch from the series for now, as it's not really > needed AFAICT, and is incomplete. > > I've dropped patches #9 and #10 locally, and left the testcase (patch #11) running in a loop > testing both native and gdbserver for over an hour and saw no failures. Any objections > to pushing the series without those two patches? WHIW, that would be fine by me. As you pointed out the real fix for the issues is provided by other patches of this series anyway. Lancelot.