From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id 8LY7Jb8BsmH6KAAAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 09 Dec 2021 08:16:47 -0500 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 88A7C1F0CE; Thu, 9 Dec 2021 08:16:47 -0500 (EST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RDNS_DYNAMIC,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (ip-8-43-85-97.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EAEED1EDEE for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2021 08:16:46 -0500 (EST) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0ADCC385801A for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2021 13:16:46 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 0ADCC385801A DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1639055806; bh=4zmpjxwJwhpLLSr+vhn9WW2kDZ3wIgA0Nt5xf61ICH4=; h=Date:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc: From; b=BEi+EIDwoCVHwmOpP7Za0tW7W9RX0yv/9X1A7am5gPEumuhM4uXSNjPFh4Y2bdLVf dmKu2P9U9OBH5yQkj52vCQwuiSDkP4QJz50yhEjBUqX+t0Z0zQ51Y/Cj8GXje736wo TyJh3BHDlTW63dfV3xUBHvoh3zAe0DfPb5fB3Ruw= Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 68F723858C39 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2021 13:16:26 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 68F723858C39 Received: from mail-wm1-f69.google.com (mail-wm1-f69.google.com [209.85.128.69]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-307-j1Yy2ZqcNjq-Xr30k2fyww-1; Thu, 09 Dec 2021 08:16:24 -0500 X-MC-Unique: j1Yy2ZqcNjq-Xr30k2fyww-1 Received: by mail-wm1-f69.google.com with SMTP id m14-20020a05600c3b0e00b0033308dcc933so2476845wms.7 for ; Thu, 09 Dec 2021 05:16:24 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=4zmpjxwJwhpLLSr+vhn9WW2kDZ3wIgA0Nt5xf61ICH4=; b=qJ0RXhzVj97PUkoSUS9/TcKnhohUGJPY/s+DuXRRn2fRbT73pJIDYMAJakcJIrtnbP pGL2Gezwd7FVWyaLxnDUuiC7puwGJ0vtibAsrGW7czzuLiy67mvsS5vJlDedM8X1t7LR dYu9SRHBy+UHGmRXezke1jKGU7Izyz7rU5FGPPC1uLJYoxF7ja9SSxDmxULk5x9UkbdJ YaxeRk/0f4WrbuMx9WBNoKv1G8alnPZXeSl1/yts/BvFGk/CfGcIJNGzAQDc1xT9Pes1 zCc4EC8LjBbN6TyTWEbw+Y7fEbX54ge6sWSNxFmX3S8eVPlPGe+RwGTA82hhctUSlrFO cBeQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5314HOsm3nnqYR/oZHvx042BVJR41N7+g0j/XhS6b+CIAe3VVFOF x4w1eAf3C5fFvP63etWU+Oz5NIiIB3vuCdr9QYyQt22Dk7Ch70MG9WmrAWNdBXCqWug5YhisKqM bHz9x0m7mEekfJINIkpXF+g== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:3c9b:: with SMTP id bg27mr6837231wmb.163.1639055783402; Thu, 09 Dec 2021 05:16:23 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxgjao/1CEqsqSu79OrozZGYhKugxuTNT9fdSpbT4QydBe/JNtEWcoPx2Lg/3madaqCbOvfiw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:3c9b:: with SMTP id bg27mr6837197wmb.163.1639055783171; Thu, 09 Dec 2021 05:16:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (host86-134-238-138.range86-134.btcentralplus.com. [86.134.238.138]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y7sm5601838wrw.55.2021.12.09.05.16.22 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 09 Dec 2021 05:16:22 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2021 13:16:21 +0000 To: "Kumar N, Bhuvanendra" Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix ptype and print commands for namelist variables(a fortran feature) Message-ID: <20211209131621.GC2593@redhat.com> References: <20210920094122.GB4950@embecosm.com> <20211006155135.GS1900093@embecosm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: X-Operating-System: Linux/5.8.18-100.fc31.x86_64 (x86_64) X-Uptime: 13:12:48 up 3 days, 3:14, X-Editor: GNU Emacs [ http://www.gnu.org/software/emacs ] X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Andrew Burgess via Gdb-patches Reply-To: Andrew Burgess Cc: "Achra, Nitika" , "Joseph, Ancel" , "E, Nagajyothi" , "George, Jini Susan" , "Sharma, Alok Kumar" , "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces+public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb-patches" * Kumar N, Bhuvanendra via Gdb-patches [2021-11-19 14:32:35 +0000]: > [AMD Official Use Only] > > Hi Andrew, > > Looks like gfortran is emitting DW_TAG_namelist for "nml" twice, > hence you are seeing it twice with "info local" command. But > clang/flang emits only once, hence I am getting only once with "info > local" command. Ahh, that explains it. I tried rebasing your patch onto the current upstream/master, and I'm hitting this assert: gdbsupport/array-view.h:190: internal-error: slice: Assertion `start + size <= m_size' failed. I do compile GDB with `_GLIBCXX_DEBUG` defined in order to see that assert. I haven't looked into what might be going on here yet, but thought I'd give you a heads up. ( Please let me know if you can't reproduce this issue, it is possible that I've managed to break something when merging/rebasing your patch. ) Thanks, Andrew