From: Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: [PATCH 05/11] gdb: add setter / getter for thread_info resumed state
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2021 12:56:58 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210622165704.2404007-6-simon.marchi@polymtl.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210622165704.2404007-1-simon.marchi@polymtl.ca>
A following patch will want to do things when a thread's resumed state
changes. Make the `resumed` field private (renamed to `m_resumed`) and
add a getter and a setter for it. The following patch in question will
therefore be able to add some code to the setter.
gdb/ChangeLog:
* gdbthread.h (struct thread_info) <resumed>: Rename to...
<m_resumed>: This. Change all uses to use the resumed and
set_resumed methods.
<resumed, set_resumed>: New methods.
Change-Id: I360c48cc55a036503174313261ce4e757d795319
---
gdb/breakpoint.c | 3 +--
gdb/gdbthread.h | 23 +++++++++++++++--------
gdb/infrun.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
gdb/remote.c | 2 +-
gdb/thread.c | 2 +-
5 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gdb/breakpoint.c b/gdb/breakpoint.c
index 7d7e299ad5ff..73d2b536b35d 100644
--- a/gdb/breakpoint.c
+++ b/gdb/breakpoint.c
@@ -406,8 +406,7 @@ breakpoints_should_be_inserted_now (void)
/* Don't remove breakpoints yet if, even though all threads are
stopped, we still have events to process. */
for (thread_info *tp : all_non_exited_threads ())
- if (tp->resumed
- && tp->suspend.waitstatus_pending_p)
+ if (tp->resumed () && tp->suspend.waitstatus_pending_p)
return 1;
}
return 0;
diff --git a/gdb/gdbthread.h b/gdb/gdbthread.h
index 54c097206d16..2f3d85d34eaa 100644
--- a/gdb/gdbthread.h
+++ b/gdb/gdbthread.h
@@ -293,14 +293,11 @@ class thread_info : public refcounted_object,
thread is off and running. */
bool executing = false;
- /* True if this thread is resumed from infrun's perspective.
- Note that a thread can be marked both as not-executing and
- resumed at the same time. This happens if we try to resume a
- thread that has a wait status pending. We shouldn't let the
- thread really run until that wait status has been processed, but
- we should not process that wait status if we didn't try to let
- the thread run. */
- bool resumed = false;
+ bool resumed () const
+ { return m_resumed; }
+
+ void set_resumed (bool resumed)
+ { m_resumed = resumed; }
/* Frontend view of the thread state. Note that the THREAD_RUNNING/
THREAD_STOPPED states are different from EXECUTING. When the
@@ -393,6 +390,16 @@ class thread_info : public refcounted_object,
/* Displaced-step state for this thread. */
displaced_step_thread_state displaced_step_state;
+
+private:
+ /* True if this thread is resumed from infrun's perspective.
+ Note that a thread can be marked both as not-executing and
+ resumed at the same time. This happens if we try to resume a
+ thread that has a wait status pending. We shouldn't let the
+ thread really run until that wait status has been processed, but
+ we should not process that wait status if we didn't try to let
+ the thread run. */
+ bool m_resumed = false;
};
/* A gdb::ref_ptr pointer to a thread_info. */
diff --git a/gdb/infrun.c b/gdb/infrun.c
index fcd0f4e10ced..450e6177cb89 100644
--- a/gdb/infrun.c
+++ b/gdb/infrun.c
@@ -1920,7 +1920,7 @@ start_step_over (void)
}
if (tp->control.trap_expected
- || tp->resumed
+ || tp->resumed ()
|| tp->executing)
{
internal_error (__FILE__, __LINE__,
@@ -1928,7 +1928,7 @@ start_step_over (void)
"trap_expected=%d, resumed=%d, executing=%d\n",
target_pid_to_str (tp->ptid).c_str (),
tp->control.trap_expected,
- tp->resumed,
+ tp->resumed (),
tp->executing);
}
@@ -1953,7 +1953,7 @@ start_step_over (void)
/* If the thread's step over could not be initiated because no buffers
were available, it was re-added to the global step over chain. */
- if (tp->resumed)
+ if (tp->resumed ())
{
infrun_debug_printf ("[%s] was resumed.",
target_pid_to_str (tp->ptid).c_str ());
@@ -2220,7 +2220,7 @@ resume_1 (enum gdb_signal sig)
currently_stepping (tp));
tp->inf->process_target ()->threads_executing = true;
- tp->resumed = true;
+ tp->set_resumed (true);
/* FIXME: What should we do if we are supposed to resume this
thread with a signal? Maybe we should maintain a queue of
@@ -2342,7 +2342,7 @@ resume_1 (enum gdb_signal sig)
resume_ptid = internal_resume_ptid (user_step);
do_target_resume (resume_ptid, false, GDB_SIGNAL_0);
- tp->resumed = true;
+ tp->set_resumed (true);
return;
}
}
@@ -2551,7 +2551,7 @@ resume_1 (enum gdb_signal sig)
}
do_target_resume (resume_ptid, step, sig);
- tp->resumed = true;
+ tp->set_resumed (true);
}
/* Resume the inferior. SIG is the signal to give the inferior
@@ -2803,7 +2803,7 @@ maybe_set_commit_resumed_all_targets ()
resuming more threads. */
bool has_thread_with_pending_status = false;
for (thread_info *thread : all_non_exited_threads (proc_target))
- if (thread->resumed && thread->suspend.waitstatus_pending_p)
+ if (thread->resumed () && thread->suspend.waitstatus_pending_p)
{
has_thread_with_pending_status = true;
break;
@@ -3238,7 +3238,7 @@ proceed (CORE_ADDR addr, enum gdb_signal siggnal)
continue;
}
- if (tp->resumed)
+ if (tp->resumed ())
{
infrun_debug_printf ("[%s] resumed",
target_pid_to_str (tp->ptid).c_str ());
@@ -3263,7 +3263,7 @@ proceed (CORE_ADDR addr, enum gdb_signal siggnal)
error (_("Command aborted."));
}
}
- else if (!cur_thr->resumed && !thread_is_in_step_over_chain (cur_thr))
+ else if (!cur_thr->resumed () && !thread_is_in_step_over_chain (cur_thr))
{
/* The thread wasn't started, and isn't queued, run it now. */
reset_ecs (ecs, cur_thr);
@@ -3408,7 +3408,7 @@ infrun_thread_stop_requested (ptid_t ptid)
/* Otherwise we can process the (new) pending event now. Set
it so this pending event is considered by
do_target_wait. */
- tp->resumed = true;
+ tp->set_resumed (true);
}
}
@@ -3505,7 +3505,7 @@ random_pending_event_thread (inferior *inf, ptid_t waiton_ptid)
auto has_event = [&] (thread_info *tp)
{
return (tp->ptid.matches (waiton_ptid)
- && tp->resumed
+ && tp->resumed ()
&& tp->suspend.waitstatus_pending_p);
};
@@ -3852,7 +3852,7 @@ prepare_for_detach (void)
}
}
else
- thr->resumed = false;
+ thr->set_resumed (false);
}
}
@@ -4893,7 +4893,7 @@ handle_one (const wait_one_event &event)
t->stop_requested = 0;
t->executing = 0;
- t->resumed = false;
+ t->set_resumed (false);
t->control.may_range_step = 0;
/* This may be the first time we see the inferior report
@@ -5063,7 +5063,7 @@ stop_all_threads (void)
/* The thread may be not executing, but still be
resumed with a pending status to process. */
- t->resumed = false;
+ t->set_resumed (false);
}
}
@@ -5808,7 +5808,7 @@ restart_threads (struct thread_info *event_thread)
continue;
}
- if (tp->resumed)
+ if (tp->resumed ())
{
infrun_debug_printf ("restart threads: [%s] resumed",
target_pid_to_str (tp->ptid).c_str ());
@@ -5820,7 +5820,7 @@ restart_threads (struct thread_info *event_thread)
{
infrun_debug_printf ("restart threads: [%s] needs step-over",
target_pid_to_str (tp->ptid).c_str ());
- gdb_assert (!tp->resumed);
+ gdb_assert (!tp->resumed ());
continue;
}
@@ -5829,7 +5829,7 @@ restart_threads (struct thread_info *event_thread)
{
infrun_debug_printf ("restart threads: [%s] has pending status",
target_pid_to_str (tp->ptid).c_str ());
- tp->resumed = true;
+ tp->set_resumed (true);
continue;
}
@@ -5873,7 +5873,7 @@ static int
resumed_thread_with_pending_status (struct thread_info *tp,
void *arg)
{
- return (tp->resumed
+ return (tp->resumed ()
&& tp->suspend.waitstatus_pending_p);
}
@@ -5959,7 +5959,7 @@ finish_step_over (struct execution_control_state *ecs)
/* This was cleared early, by handle_inferior_event. Set it
so this pending event is considered by
do_target_wait. */
- tp->resumed = true;
+ tp->set_resumed (true);
gdb_assert (!tp->executing);
@@ -7519,7 +7519,7 @@ restart_after_all_stop_detach (process_stratum_target *proc_target)
/* If we have a pending event to process, skip resuming the
target and go straight to processing it. */
- if (thr->resumed && thr->suspend.waitstatus_pending_p)
+ if (thr->resumed () && thr->suspend.waitstatus_pending_p)
return;
}
@@ -7624,7 +7624,7 @@ keep_going_stepped_thread (struct thread_info *tp)
get_frame_address_space (frame),
tp->suspend.stop_pc);
- tp->resumed = true;
+ tp->set_resumed (true);
resume_ptid = internal_resume_ptid (tp->control.stepping_command);
do_target_resume (resume_ptid, false, GDB_SIGNAL_0);
}
@@ -8039,7 +8039,7 @@ static void
keep_going_pass_signal (struct execution_control_state *ecs)
{
gdb_assert (ecs->event_thread->ptid == inferior_ptid);
- gdb_assert (!ecs->event_thread->resumed);
+ gdb_assert (!ecs->event_thread->resumed ());
/* Save the pc before execution, to compare with pc after stop. */
ecs->event_thread->prev_pc
diff --git a/gdb/remote.c b/gdb/remote.c
index 22933eeaeec6..f08616be9b67 100644
--- a/gdb/remote.c
+++ b/gdb/remote.c
@@ -8132,7 +8132,7 @@ static ptid_t
first_remote_resumed_thread (remote_target *target)
{
for (thread_info *tp : all_non_exited_threads (target, minus_one_ptid))
- if (tp->resumed)
+ if (tp->resumed ())
return tp->ptid;
return null_ptid;
}
diff --git a/gdb/thread.c b/gdb/thread.c
index 925ed96c3d83..c6c63b742db4 100644
--- a/gdb/thread.c
+++ b/gdb/thread.c
@@ -708,7 +708,7 @@ void
set_resumed (process_stratum_target *targ, ptid_t ptid, bool resumed)
{
for (thread_info *tp : all_non_exited_threads (targ, ptid))
- tp->resumed = resumed;
+ tp->set_resumed (resumed);
}
/* Helper for set_running, that marks one thread either running or
--
2.32.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-22 16:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-22 16:56 [PATCH 00/11] Various thread lists optimizations Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-06-22 16:56 ` [PATCH 01/11] gdb: introduce iterator_range, remove next_adapter Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-07-05 15:41 ` Pedro Alves
2021-07-06 19:16 ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-06-22 16:56 ` [PATCH 02/11] gdb: introduce intrusive_list, make thread_info use it Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-06-22 23:13 ` Lancelot SIX via Gdb-patches
2021-06-23 0:48 ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-07-05 15:44 ` Pedro Alves
2021-07-06 19:38 ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-07-06 20:45 ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-07-06 21:04 ` Pedro Alves
2021-07-06 21:38 ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-07-06 21:02 ` Pedro Alves
2021-07-06 21:45 ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-07-07 11:46 ` Pedro Alves
2021-07-07 13:52 ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-06-22 16:56 ` [PATCH 03/11] gdb: make inferior_list use intrusive_list Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-07-05 15:44 ` Pedro Alves
2021-07-14 6:34 ` Tom de Vries
2021-07-14 16:11 ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-07-14 20:15 ` [PATCH] gdb: make all_inferiors_safe actually work Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-07-15 10:15 ` Tom de Vries
2021-07-17 12:54 ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-06-22 16:56 ` [PATCH 04/11] gdb: use intrusive list for step-over chain Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-07-05 15:45 ` Pedro Alves
2021-07-06 20:59 ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-06-22 16:56 ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches [this message]
2021-07-05 15:45 ` [PATCH 05/11] gdb: add setter / getter for thread_info resumed state Pedro Alves
2021-06-22 16:56 ` [PATCH 06/11] gdb: make thread_info::suspend private, add getters / setters Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-07-05 15:45 ` Pedro Alves
2021-06-22 16:57 ` [PATCH 07/11] gdb: maintain per-process-target list of resumed threads with pending wait status Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-07-05 15:51 ` Pedro Alves
2021-07-06 21:25 ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-07-07 12:01 ` Pedro Alves
2021-07-12 22:28 ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-07-12 22:34 ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-07-13 12:21 ` Pedro Alves
2021-06-22 16:57 ` [PATCH 08/11] gdb: optimize check for resumed threads with pending wait status in maybe_set_commit_resumed_all_targets Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-07-05 15:51 ` Pedro Alves
2021-06-22 16:57 ` [PATCH 09/11] gdb: optimize selection of resumed thread with pending event Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-07-05 15:51 ` Pedro Alves
2021-06-22 16:57 ` [PATCH 10/11] gdb: maintain ptid -> thread map, optimize find_thread_ptid Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-07-05 15:52 ` Pedro Alves
2021-07-06 21:31 ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-07-07 12:13 ` Pedro Alves
2021-06-22 16:57 ` [PATCH 11/11] gdb: optimize all_matching_threads_iterator Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-07-05 15:52 ` Pedro Alves
2021-07-14 9:40 ` Tom de Vries
2021-07-13 0:47 ` [PATCH 00/11] Various thread lists optimizations Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210622165704.2404007-6-simon.marchi@polymtl.ca \
--to=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=simon.marchi@polymtl.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox