From: Andrew Burgess <andrew.burgess@embecosm.com>
To: George Barrett <bob@bob131.so>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] Guile: add {r,}value-reference-value
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2021 17:59:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210428165945.GB2364578@embecosm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a2/om2x1eht6jpueahqskn1s9k/0gbd/dzo-o5epa&g2-vmj3eo_@mail.bob131.so>
* George Barrett via Gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org> [2021-04-29 02:27:37 +1000]:
> The Guile API doesn't currently have an equivalent to the Python API's
> Value.reference_value() or Value.rvalue_reference_value(). This commit
> adds a procedure with equivalent semantics to the Guile API.
Thank you for doing this work. I'm sorry to be a real pain, but could
you rename the second new function to value-rvalue-reference-value
please, I think this would be inline with the existing naming
convention; the first 'value-' indicates that the function applies to
something of value type, and the rest of the name
'rvalue-reference-value' indicates what you're going to get.
If you just make the rename as suggested, then this patch is approved.
Thanks,
Andrew
>
> gdb/ChangeLog:
>
> 2021-04-29 George Barrett <bob@bob131.so>
>
> * guile/scm-value.c (gdbscm_reference_value): Add helper
> function for reference value creation.
> (gdbscm_value_reference_value): Add implementation of
> value-reference-value procedure.
> (gdbscm_rvalue_reference_value): Add implementation of
> rvalue-reference-value procedure.
> (value_functions): Add value-reference-value procedure.
> Add rvalue-reference-value procedure.
> * NEWS (Guile API): Note the addition of new procedures.
>
> gdb/doc/ChangeLog:
>
> 2021-04-29 George Barrett <bob@bob131.so>
>
> * guile.texi (Values From Inferior In Guile): Add
> documentation for value-reference-value.
> Add documentation for rvalue-reference-value.
>
> gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>
> 2021-04-29 George Barrett <bob@bob131.so>
>
> * gdb.guile/scm-value.exp (test_value_in_inferior): Add test
> for value-reference-value.
> Add test for rvalue-reference-value.
> ---
> gdb/NEWS | 3 ++
> gdb/doc/guile.texi | 10 +++++++
> gdb/guile/scm-value.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> gdb/testsuite/gdb.guile/scm-value.exp | 10 +++++++
> 4 files changed, 65 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/gdb/NEWS b/gdb/NEWS
> index 9c76df8b6d5..0c51f5fceca 100644
> --- a/gdb/NEWS
> +++ b/gdb/NEWS
> @@ -192,6 +192,9 @@ QMemTags
> value-referenced-value procedure now handles rvalue reference
> values.
>
> + ** New procedures for obtaining reference values:
> + value-reference-value and rvalue-reference-value.
> +
> *** Changes in GDB 10
>
> * There are new feature names for ARC targets: "org.gnu.gdb.arc.core"
> diff --git a/gdb/doc/guile.texi b/gdb/doc/guile.texi
> index c7904574002..18782bb7589 100644
> --- a/gdb/doc/guile.texi
> +++ b/gdb/doc/guile.texi
> @@ -801,6 +801,16 @@ The @code{<gdb:value>} object @code{scm-val} is identical to that
> corresponding to @code{val}.
> @end deffn
>
> +@deffn {Scheme Procedure} value-reference-value value
> +Return a new @code{<gdb:value>} object which is a reference to the value
> +encapsulated by @code{<gdb:value>} object @var{value}.
> +@end deffn
> +
> +@deffn {Scheme Procedure} rvalue-reference-value value
> +Return a new @code{<gdb:value>} object which is an rvalue reference to
> +the value encapsulated by @code{<gdb:value>} object @var{value}.
> +@end deffn
> +
> @deffn {Scheme Procedure} value-field value field-name
> Return field @var{field-name} from @code{<gdb:value>} object @var{value}.
> @end deffn
> diff --git a/gdb/guile/scm-value.c b/gdb/guile/scm-value.c
> index f50e8b5b46c..2ab193f044a 100644
> --- a/gdb/guile/scm-value.c
> +++ b/gdb/guile/scm-value.c
> @@ -488,6 +488,38 @@ gdbscm_value_referenced_value (SCM self)
> });
> }
>
> +static SCM
> +gdbscm_reference_value (SCM self, enum type_code refcode)
> +{
> + value_smob *v_smob
> + = vlscm_get_value_smob_arg_unsafe (self, SCM_ARG1, FUNC_NAME);
> + struct value *value = v_smob->value;
> +
> + return gdbscm_wrap ([=]
> + {
> + scoped_value_mark free_values;
> +
> + struct value *res_val = value_ref (value, refcode);
> + return vlscm_scm_from_value (res_val);
> + });
> +}
> +
> +/* (value-reference-value <gdb:value>) -> <gdb:value> */
> +
> +static SCM
> +gdbscm_value_reference_value (SCM self)
> +{
> + return gdbscm_reference_value (self, TYPE_CODE_REF);
> +}
> +
> +/* (rvalue-reference-value <gdb:value>) -> <gdb:value> */
> +
> +static SCM
> +gdbscm_rvalue_reference_value (SCM self)
> +{
> + return gdbscm_reference_value (self, TYPE_CODE_RVALUE_REF);
> +}
> +
> /* (value-type <gdb:value>) -> <gdb:type> */
>
> static SCM
> @@ -1352,6 +1384,16 @@ For example, for a value which is a reference to an 'int' pointer ('int *'),\n\
> value-dereference will result in a value of type 'int' while\n\
> value-referenced-value will result in a value of type 'int *'." },
>
> + { "value-reference-value", 1, 0, 0,
> + as_a_scm_t_subr (gdbscm_value_reference_value),
> + "\
> +Return a <gdb:value> object which is a reference to the given value." },
> +
> + { "rvalue-reference-value", 1, 0, 0,
> + as_a_scm_t_subr (gdbscm_rvalue_reference_value),
> + "\
> +Return a <gdb:value> object which is an rvalue reference to the given value." },
> +
> { "value-field", 2, 0, 0, as_a_scm_t_subr (gdbscm_value_field),
> "\
> Return the specified field of the value.\n\
> diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.guile/scm-value.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.guile/scm-value.exp
> index 191af1d71a6..883c4bea72e 100644
> --- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.guile/scm-value.exp
> +++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.guile/scm-value.exp
> @@ -173,6 +173,16 @@ proc test_value_in_inferior {} {
> "get string beyond null"
> gdb_test "gu (print nullst)" \
> "= divide\\\\000et"
> +
> + gdb_scm_test_silent_cmd "gu (define argv-ref (value-reference-value argv))" \
> + "test value-reference-value"
> + gdb_test "gu (equal? argv (value-referenced-value argv-ref))" "#t"
> + gdb_test "gu (eqv? (type-code (value-type argv-ref)) TYPE_CODE_REF)" "#t"
> +
> + gdb_scm_test_silent_cmd "gu (define argv-rref (rvalue-reference-value argv))" \
> + "test rvalue-reference-value"
> + gdb_test "gu (equal? argv (value-referenced-value argv-rref))" "#t"
> + gdb_test "gu (eqv? (type-code (value-type argv-rref)) TYPE_CODE_RVALUE_REF)" "#t"
> }
>
> proc test_strings {} {
> --
> 2.30.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-28 16:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-28 16:27 [PATCH v3 0/3] Guile: add value-{reference,const}-value George Barrett via Gdb-patches
2021-04-28 16:27 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] Guile: improved rvalue reference support George Barrett via Gdb-patches
2021-04-28 16:38 ` Eli Zaretskii via Gdb-patches
2021-04-28 16:54 ` Andrew Burgess
2021-04-28 16:27 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] Guile: add {r,}value-reference-value George Barrett via Gdb-patches
2021-04-28 16:40 ` Eli Zaretskii via Gdb-patches
2021-04-28 16:59 ` Andrew Burgess [this message]
2021-04-28 17:11 ` George Barrett via Gdb-patches
2021-04-28 16:27 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] Guile: add value-const-value George Barrett via Gdb-patches
2021-04-28 16:39 ` Eli Zaretskii via Gdb-patches
2021-04-28 17:00 ` Andrew Burgess
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210428165945.GB2364578@embecosm.com \
--to=andrew.burgess@embecosm.com \
--cc=bob@bob131.so \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox