From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id n5VcGMPr/F/8KwAAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 19:22:27 -0500 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 5C31F1EEEF; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 19:22:27 -0500 (EST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RDNS_NONE,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (unknown [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0EB321E940 for ; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 19:22:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 687FF3846403; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 00:22:26 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 687FF3846403 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1610410946; bh=Vc/N7QdUfvC8w4X/6bzHamg1CuI2JdVXc1yy1lp/Wyk=; h=Date:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc: From; b=EsAjV1UJct5gFvDFe4GvBXo/ycP0SiIPwXIPx94wEZwZcqZMNufD0ptYxL1yh4daB zUP6wOTls8EqG7pajyymTGcR9+ZR7omqaphw34+/JmO+uRKkBH7ndbqohYIiDY77R7 u/kO4+jMGP9VsCmZAwc7H8mGEvnNyM5UhcGESfuM= Received: from mail-pf1-x434.google.com (mail-pf1-x434.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::434]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F03953887022; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 00:22:23 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org F03953887022 Received: by mail-pf1-x434.google.com with SMTP id q20so291638pfu.8; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 16:22:23 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=Vc/N7QdUfvC8w4X/6bzHamg1CuI2JdVXc1yy1lp/Wyk=; b=rNVyqblaxtkwzimA/MVSBHIc3tR20VJNvdZDKgHptmlIZqav6QlWrXmemS5if+q8qK AbKdFxXpKsQtETWkobvLSf0HlY5peEhpF9i3rnVVqr/u3GbOGRfLz60I7S1kf47UKGRt Qmx4zGzI0xjoM4pkGmopFkIZKFWlnLA9i/ek90LVo8QzZbE6E/LE53BITjbXffMNw0jV iCsga6RRH08zrRF0QQdoyqAQpNQ177A7nuHB/kd01sIFfr8dc5fvufMaH4fYa22bJBhA utPiEx5y+0RuKWeU28VNgdAZnVStZDM15WTECAKR7NMDqqZqXhU6wLCofP3ywTrsddg9 CvUw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532yCXOBEHvsYI43pA/sVhlfIsK+1dIfcyyqMK8fwrtXdpUuUzVF e5FU5lRCZjoo8z46SuE/BC4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz6JldNbDCLsEXRvov4aCzJSavy2KjmDoaglFk2dZrJ0RKUfwt/l4l7uGZ9V7TFB1L6UVVsMQ== X-Received: by 2002:a65:654e:: with SMTP id a14mr1951374pgw.265.1610410943234; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 16:22:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from bubble.grove.modra.org (158.106.96.58.static.exetel.com.au. [58.96.106.158]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c10sm855526pfj.54.2021.01.11.16.22.22 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 11 Jan 2021 16:22:22 -0800 (PST) Received: by bubble.grove.modra.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4607047DD8; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 10:52:19 +1030 (ACDT) Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2021 10:52:19 +1030 To: "H.J. Lu" Subject: Re: V2 [PATCH 1/2] GCC: Check if AR works with --plugin and rc Message-ID: <20210112002219.GE5523@bubble.grove.modra.org> References: <20210111165706.92117-1-hjl.tools@gmail.com> <20210111165706.92117-2-hjl.tools@gmail.com> <20210111232743.GD5523@bubble.grove.modra.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Alan Modra via Gdb-patches Reply-To: Alan Modra Cc: Joel Brobecker , GCC Patches , Binutils , GDB Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb-patches" On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 04:07:22PM -0800, H.J. Lu wrote: > These are not fatal errors. Here is the updated patch to use > AC_MSG_WARN instead. OK for master? OK by me. Please squash the two patches. -- Alan Modra Australia Development Lab, IBM