On 11 Jan 2021 11:01, Andrew Burgess wrote: > * Mike Frysinger via Gdb-patches [2021-01-10 03:25:03 -0500]: > > > Every arch handles this the same way, so move it to the common code. > > This will also make unifying the sim_cpu structure easier. > > Please can you include the ChangeLog entries with the patch > submissions. > > Could we not remove the `extra_bytes` parameter from sim_cpu_alloc_all > now? As far as I can tell it is always passed as 0? Or have I missed > something? it is technically an exported API, but we haven't really been guaranteeing ABI stability anywhere as it's a static lib. i was being a bit conservative, but maybe it's overly so since no other consumers have shown up in decades. -mike