From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id yIItIWgjxV+3LAAAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2020 11:52:56 -0500 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 743D61F0AC; Mon, 30 Nov 2020 11:52:56 -0500 (EST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CBC351E552 for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2020 11:52:55 -0500 (EST) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A5993898015; Mon, 30 Nov 2020 16:52:55 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 2A5993898015 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1606755175; bh=uX2vi4bcf19sGCDdmUDhGahtJu8AYhC2mDddq7rn8aI=; h=To:Subject:Date:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post: List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc:From; b=ZCfu80ayX/+MKxyQzOGhowMTSP2iwC4sm2IFEjmYrqvn3iW1QdrmfqscQil0AthXG BbTZSu2SiwyUMF2NU8dUTFFEroV3zZqXbtQPCIRXuBUOnF8OAewDG9gkrAtA6ziJwJ cpELzsg+TWK1cVOJe40yfrSvKQjkvosMTgj+V2/U= Received: from barracuda.ebox.ca (barracuda.ebox.ca [96.127.255.19]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E0BD9388A404 for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2020 16:52:52 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org E0BD9388A404 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1606755171-0c856e6cd5295e80001-fS2M51 Received: from smtp.ebox.ca (smtp.ebox.ca [96.127.255.82]) by barracuda.ebox.ca with ESMTP id uGem1ERxTBqWT7pa (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 30 Nov 2020 11:52:51 -0500 (EST) X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: simon.marchi@efficios.com X-Barracuda-RBL-Trusted-Forwarder: 96.127.255.82 Received: from epycamd.internal.efficios.com (192-222-181-218.qc.cable.ebox.net [192.222.181.218]) by smtp.ebox.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id A67DA441B21; Mon, 30 Nov 2020 11:52:51 -0500 (EST) X-Barracuda-RBL-IP: 192.222.181.218 X-Barracuda-Effective-Source-IP: 192-222-181-218.qc.cable.ebox.net[192.222.181.218] X-Barracuda-Apparent-Source-IP: 192.222.181.218 To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: [PATCH 0/4] Clear target async event handlers in wait method Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2020 11:52:47 -0500 X-ASG-Orig-Subj: [PATCH 0/4] Clear target async event handlers in wait method Message-Id: <20201130165251.830482-1-simon.marchi@efficios.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.29.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Barracuda-Connect: smtp.ebox.ca[96.127.255.82] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1606755171 X-Barracuda-Encrypted: DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA X-Barracuda-URL: https://96.127.255.19:443/cgi-mod/mark.cgi X-Virus-Scanned: by bsmtpd at ebox.ca X-Barracuda-Scan-Msg-Size: 1034 X-Barracuda-BRTS-Status: 1 X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.00 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.00 using global scores of TAG_LEVEL=1000.0 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=1000.0 KILL_LEVEL=8.0 tests= X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.3.86230 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches Reply-To: Simon Marchi Cc: Simon Marchi Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb-patches" This change started out as part of some work I intend to submit at a later time, related to how infrun consumes target events. However, I noticed it would address PR 26614 ("AddressSanitizer: heap-use-after-free of extended_remote_target in remote_async_inferior_event_handler"). And in my opinion it's a desirable change no matter what, because it simplifies things a little bit. So I extracted it and am submitting it on its own. Simon Marchi (4): gdb: make async event handlers clear themselves gdb: make remote target clear its async event handler in wait gdb: make record-btrace target clear its async event handler in wait gdb: make record-full target clear its async event handler in wait gdb/async-event.c | 1 - gdb/async-event.h | 9 +++++++++ gdb/infrun.c | 1 + gdb/record-btrace.c | 3 +++ gdb/record-full.c | 2 ++ gdb/remote-notif.c | 4 +++- gdb/remote.c | 25 +++++++++---------------- 7 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) -- 2.29.2