From: Luis Machado via Gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Cc: david.spickett@linaro.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 01/24] New target methods for memory tagging support
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2020 14:04:12 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201109170435.15766-2-luis.machado@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201109170435.15766-1-luis.machado@linaro.org>
Updates on v3:
- Updated the code documentation for the fetch_memtags and store_memtags
methods.
Updates on v2:
- Added type parameter to fetch_memtags/store_memtags hooks.
--
This patch starts adding some of the generic pieces to accomodate memory
tagging.
We have three new target methods:
- supports_memory_tagging: Checks if the target supports memory tagging. This
defaults to false for targets that don't support memory tagging.
- fetch_memtags: Fetches the allocation tags associated with a particular
memory range [address, address + length).
The default is to return 0 without returning any tags. This should only
be called if memory tagging is supported.
- store_memtags: Stores a set of allocation tags for a particular memory
range [address, address + length).
The default is to return 0. This should only
be called if memory tagging is supported.
It also adds a control option for enabling/disabling memory tagging
manually: set memory-tagging on/off.
The default is "on", with GDB making its use conditional to the
architecture supporting memory tagging.
gdb/ChangeLog:
YYYY-MM-DD Luis Machado <luis.machado@linaro.org>
* printcmd.c (memtag): New static global.
(show_memtag): New function.
(_initialize_printcmd): Add set/show memory-tagging command.
* remote.c (remote_target) <supports_memory_tagging>: New method
override.
<fetch_memtags>: New method override.
<store_memtags>: New method override.
(remote_target::supports_memory_tagging): New method.
(remote_target::fetch_memtags): New method.
(remote_target::store_memtags): New method.
* target-delegates.c
(dummy_target) <supports_memory_tagging>: New method override.
<fetch_memtags>: New method override.
<store_memtags>: New method override.
(debug_target) <supports_memory_tagging>: New method override.
<fetch_memtags>: New method override.
<store_memtags>: New method override.
(target_ops::supports_memory_tagging): New method.
(target_ops::fetch_memtags): New method.
(target_ops::store_memtags): New method.
(dummy_target::supports_memory_tagging): New method.
(dummy_target::fetch_memtags): New method.
(dummy_target::store_memtags): New method.
(debug_target::supports_memory_tagging): New method.
(debug_target::fetch_memtags): New method.
(debug_target::store_memtags): New method.
* target.h (struct target_ops) <supports_memory_tagging>: New virtual
method.
<fetch_memtags>: New virtual method.
<store_memtags>: New virtual method.
(target_supports_memory_tagging): Define.
(target_fetch_memtags): Define.
(target_store_memtags): Define.
---
gdb/printcmd.c | 28 ++++++++++++++
gdb/remote.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++
gdb/target-delegates.c | 84 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
gdb/target.h | 37 +++++++++++++++++++
4 files changed, 185 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gdb/printcmd.c b/gdb/printcmd.c
index f7186c296a..28451612ab 100644
--- a/gdb/printcmd.c
+++ b/gdb/printcmd.c
@@ -84,6 +84,24 @@ static CORE_ADDR last_examine_address;
static value_ref_ptr last_examine_value;
+/* If TRUE (default), and the architecture supports it, GDB will attempt to use
+ the memory tagging infrastructure to validate certain memory accesses. It
+ will also report memory tag violations alongside a SIGSEGV signal.
+
+ If FALSE, GDB will not use memory tagging in any way, and debugging will work
+ in the standard way. */
+static bool memtag = true;
+
+static void
+show_memtag (struct ui_file *file, int from_tty,
+ struct cmd_list_element *c,
+ const char *value)
+{
+ fprintf_filtered (file,
+ _("Use of memory tagging infrastructure is \"%s\".\n"),
+ value);
+}
+
/* Largest offset between a symbolic value and an address, that will be
printed as `0x1234 <symbol+offset>'. */
@@ -2893,4 +2911,14 @@ Construct a GDB command and then evaluate it.\n\
Usage: eval \"format string\", ARG1, ARG2, ARG3, ..., ARGN\n\
Convert the arguments to a string as \"printf\" would, but then\n\
treat this string as a command line, and evaluate it."));
+
+ add_setshow_boolean_cmd ("memory-tagging", class_support,
+ &memtag, _("\
+Set whether the debugger should use memory tagging infrastructure."), _("\
+Show whether the debugger should use memory tagging infrastructure."), _("\
+If on, gdb will attempt to validate memory tags and will warn the user if\n\
+certain operations have illegal tags."),
+ NULL,
+ show_memtag,
+ &setlist, &showlist);
}
diff --git a/gdb/remote.c b/gdb/remote.c
index 71f814efb3..2686de3501 100644
--- a/gdb/remote.c
+++ b/gdb/remote.c
@@ -686,6 +686,16 @@ class remote_target : public process_stratum_target
int remove_exec_catchpoint (int) override;
enum exec_direction_kind execution_direction () override;
+ bool supports_memory_tagging () override;
+
+ /* Read memory tags via the qMemTags packet */
+ int fetch_memtags (CORE_ADDR address, size_t len,
+ gdb::byte_vector &tags, int type) override;
+
+ /* Write allocation tags via the QMemTags packet. */
+ int store_memtags (CORE_ADDR address, size_t len,
+ const gdb::byte_vector &tags, int type) override;
+
public: /* Remote specific methods. */
void remote_download_command_source (int num, ULONGEST addr,
@@ -14389,6 +14399,32 @@ set_range_stepping (const char *ignore_args, int from_tty,
}
}
+/* Implement the "supports_memory_tagging" target_ops method. */
+
+bool
+remote_target::supports_memory_tagging ()
+{
+ return false;
+}
+
+/* Implement the "fetch_memtags" target_ops method. */
+
+int
+remote_target::fetch_memtags (CORE_ADDR address, size_t len,
+ gdb::byte_vector &tags, int type)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+
+/* Implement the "store_memtags" target_ops method. */
+
+int
+remote_target::store_memtags (CORE_ADDR address, size_t len,
+ const gdb::byte_vector &tags, int type)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+
void _initialize_remote ();
void
_initialize_remote ()
diff --git a/gdb/target-delegates.c b/gdb/target-delegates.c
index 437b19b858..fbebc8b4ce 100644
--- a/gdb/target-delegates.c
+++ b/gdb/target-delegates.c
@@ -173,6 +173,11 @@ struct dummy_target : public target_ops
const struct frame_unwind *get_tailcall_unwinder () override;
void prepare_to_generate_core () override;
void done_generating_core () override;
+ bool supports_memory_tagging () override;
+ int fetch_memtags (CORE_ADDR address, size_t len,
+ gdb::byte_vector &tags, int type) override;
+ int store_memtags (CORE_ADDR address, size_t len,
+ const gdb::byte_vector &tags, int type) override;
};
struct debug_target : public target_ops
@@ -344,6 +349,11 @@ struct debug_target : public target_ops
const struct frame_unwind *get_tailcall_unwinder () override;
void prepare_to_generate_core () override;
void done_generating_core () override;
+ bool supports_memory_tagging () override;
+ int fetch_memtags (CORE_ADDR address, size_t len,
+ gdb::byte_vector &tags, int type) override;
+ int store_memtags (CORE_ADDR address, size_t len,
+ const gdb::byte_vector &tags, int type) override;
};
void
@@ -4413,3 +4423,77 @@ debug_target::done_generating_core ()
fputs_unfiltered (")\n", gdb_stdlog);
}
+bool
+target_ops::supports_memory_tagging ()
+{
+ return this->beneath ()->supports_memory_tagging ();
+}
+
+int
+target_ops::fetch_memtags (CORE_ADDR address, size_t len,
+ gdb::byte_vector &tags, int type)
+{
+ return this->beneath ()->fetch_memtags (address, len, tags, type);
+}
+
+int
+target_ops::store_memtags (CORE_ADDR address, size_t len,
+ const gdb::byte_vector &tags, int type)
+{
+ return this->beneath ()->store_memtags (address, len, tags, type);
+}
+
+bool
+dummy_target::supports_memory_tagging ()
+{
+ return false;
+}
+
+int
+dummy_target::fetch_memtags (CORE_ADDR address, size_t len,
+ gdb::byte_vector &tags, int type)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+
+int
+dummy_target::store_memtags (CORE_ADDR address, size_t len,
+ const gdb::byte_vector &tags, int type)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+
+bool
+debug_target::supports_memory_tagging ()
+{
+ bool result;
+ fprintf_unfiltered (gdb_stdlog, "-> %s->supports_memory_tagging (...)\n", this->beneath ()->shortname ());
+ result = this->beneath ()->supports_memory_tagging ();
+ fprintf_unfiltered (gdb_stdlog, "<- %s->supports_memory_tagging (", this->beneath ()->shortname ());
+ fputs_unfiltered (") = ", gdb_stdlog);
+ target_debug_print_bool (result);
+ fputs_unfiltered ("\n", gdb_stdlog);
+ return result;
+}
+
+int
+debug_target::fetch_memtags (CORE_ADDR address, size_t len,
+ gdb::byte_vector &tags, int type)
+{
+ fprintf_unfiltered (gdb_stdlog, "-> %s->fetch_memtags (...)\n", this->beneath ()->shortname ());
+ int result = this->beneath ()->fetch_memtags (address, len, tags, type);
+ fprintf_unfiltered (gdb_stdlog, "<- %s->fetch_memtags (", this->beneath ()->shortname ());
+ fputs_unfiltered (")\n", gdb_stdlog);
+ return result;
+}
+
+int
+debug_target::store_memtags (CORE_ADDR address, size_t len,
+ const gdb::byte_vector &tags, int type)
+{
+ fprintf_unfiltered (gdb_stdlog, "-> %s->store_memtags (...)\n", this->beneath ()->shortname ());
+ int result = this->beneath ()->store_memtags (address, len, tags, type);
+ fprintf_unfiltered (gdb_stdlog, "<- %s->store_memtags (", this->beneath ()->shortname ());
+ fputs_unfiltered (")\n", gdb_stdlog);
+ return result;
+}
diff --git a/gdb/target.h b/gdb/target.h
index 416b8089fa..3bc958a406 100644
--- a/gdb/target.h
+++ b/gdb/target.h
@@ -1260,6 +1260,34 @@ struct target_ops
/* Cleanup after generating a core file. */
virtual void done_generating_core ()
TARGET_DEFAULT_IGNORE ();
+
+ /* Returns true if the target supports memory tagging. */
+ virtual bool supports_memory_tagging ()
+ TARGET_DEFAULT_RETURN (false);
+
+ /* Return the allocated memory tags of type TYPE associated with
+ [ADDRESS, ADDRESS + LEN) in TAGS.
+
+ LEN is the number of bytes in the memory range. TAGS is a vector of
+ bytes containing the tags found in the above memory range.
+
+ It is up to the architecture/target to interpret the bytes in the TAGS
+ vector and read the tags appropriately. */
+ virtual int fetch_memtags (CORE_ADDR address, size_t len,
+ gdb::byte_vector &tags, int type)
+ TARGET_DEFAULT_IGNORE ();
+
+ /* Write the allocation tags of type TYPE contained in TAGS to the memory
+ range [ADDRESS, ADDRESS + LEN).
+
+ LEN is the number of bytes in the memory range. TAGS is a vector of
+ bytes containing the tags to be stored to the memory range.
+
+ It is up to the architecture/target to interpret the bytes in the TAGS
+ vector and store them appropriately. */
+ virtual int store_memtags (CORE_ADDR address, size_t len,
+ const gdb::byte_vector &tags, int type)
+ TARGET_DEFAULT_IGNORE ();
};
/* Deleter for std::unique_ptr. See comments in
@@ -2312,6 +2340,15 @@ extern gdb::unique_xmalloc_ptr<char> target_fileio_read_stralloc
#define target_augmented_libraries_svr4_read() \
(current_top_target ()->augmented_libraries_svr4_read) ()
+#define target_supports_memory_tagging() \
+ ((current_top_target ()->supports_memory_tagging) ())
+
+#define target_fetch_memtags(address, len, tags, type) \
+ (current_top_target ()->fetch_memtags) ((address), (len), (tags), (type))
+
+#define target_store_memtags(address, len, tags, type) \
+ (current_top_target ()->store_memtags) ((address), (len), (tags), (type))
+
/* Command logging facility. */
#define target_log_command(p) \
--
2.17.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-09 17:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 96+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-09 17:04 [PATCH v3 00/24] Memory Tagging Support + AArch64 Linux implementation Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-11-09 17:04 ` Luis Machado via Gdb-patches [this message]
2020-12-25 4:26 ` [PATCH v3 01/24] New target methods for memory tagging support Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2020-12-28 15:05 ` Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-12-25 5:08 ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2020-11-09 17:04 ` [PATCH v3 02/24] New gdbarch memory tagging hooks Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-12-25 4:40 ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2020-12-28 15:44 ` Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-11-09 17:04 ` [PATCH v3 03/24] Add GDB-side remote target support for memory tagging Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-12-25 5:08 ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2020-12-28 16:28 ` Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-11-09 17:04 ` [PATCH v3 04/24] Unit testing for GDB-side remote memory tagging handling Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-12-25 5:34 ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2020-12-28 17:17 ` Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-11-09 17:04 ` [PATCH v3 05/24] GDBserver remote packet support for memory tagging Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-12-25 5:50 ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2020-12-28 17:46 ` Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-11-09 17:04 ` [PATCH v3 06/24] Unit tests for gdbserver memory tagging remote packets Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-12-25 20:13 ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2020-12-28 18:12 ` Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-11-09 17:04 ` [PATCH v3 07/24] Documentation for " Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-11-09 17:08 ` Eli Zaretskii via Gdb-patches
2020-11-16 15:44 ` David Spickett via Gdb-patches
2020-11-16 16:04 ` David Spickett via Gdb-patches
2020-11-16 17:22 ` Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-11-17 10:05 ` David Spickett via Gdb-patches
2020-11-17 12:01 ` Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-11-17 12:29 ` David Spickett via Gdb-patches
2020-11-17 14:44 ` Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-11-17 15:16 ` David Spickett via Gdb-patches
2020-11-17 17:29 ` Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-11-18 10:39 ` David Spickett via Gdb-patches
2020-11-18 10:56 ` Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-11-18 11:22 ` David Spickett via Gdb-patches
2020-11-16 16:49 ` Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-11-09 17:04 ` [PATCH v3 08/24] AArch64: Add MTE CPU feature check support Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-12-26 0:04 ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2020-11-09 17:04 ` [PATCH v3 09/24] AArch64: Add target description/feature for MTE registers Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-12-26 0:10 ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2020-12-28 18:28 ` Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-11-09 17:04 ` [PATCH v3 10/24] AArch64: Add MTE register set support for GDB and gdbserver Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-12-26 0:17 ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2020-12-28 18:41 ` Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-11-09 17:04 ` [PATCH v3 11/24] AArch64: Add MTE ptrace requests Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-12-26 0:19 ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2020-12-28 19:12 ` Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-11-09 17:04 ` [PATCH v3 12/24] AArch64: Implement memory tagging target methods for AArch64 Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-12-26 0:33 ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2020-12-28 19:50 ` Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-11-09 17:04 ` [PATCH v3 13/24] Refactor parsing of /proc/<pid>/smaps Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-12-26 6:36 ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2020-12-29 10:57 ` Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-11-09 17:04 ` [PATCH v3 14/24] AArch64: Implement the memory tagging gdbarch hooks Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-12-26 6:52 ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2020-12-29 12:16 ` Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2021-01-18 16:29 ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-01-20 20:01 ` Tom Tromey
2020-11-09 17:04 ` [PATCH v3 15/24] AArch64: Add unit testing for logical tag set/get operations Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-11-09 17:04 ` [PATCH v3 16/24] AArch64: Report tag violation error information Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-11-16 15:43 ` David Spickett via Gdb-patches
2020-11-16 16:45 ` Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-11-17 9:36 ` David Spickett via Gdb-patches
2020-12-26 22:23 ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2020-12-30 0:50 ` Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-11-09 17:04 ` [PATCH v3 17/24] AArch64: Add gdbserver MTE support Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-12-26 22:30 ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2020-12-29 14:32 ` Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-11-09 17:04 ` [PATCH v3 18/24] AArch64: Add MTE register set support for core files Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-11-09 17:04 ` [PATCH v3 19/24] New mtag commands Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-12-27 3:32 ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2020-12-29 17:21 ` Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-11-09 17:04 ` [PATCH v3 20/24] Documentation for the new " Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-11-09 17:11 ` Eli Zaretskii via Gdb-patches
2020-11-09 17:04 ` [PATCH v3 21/24] Extend "x" and "print" commands to support memory tagging Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-11-09 17:14 ` Eli Zaretskii via Gdb-patches
2020-11-09 17:20 ` Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-12-27 4:18 ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2020-12-29 18:50 ` Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2021-01-18 17:56 ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-01-18 20:20 ` Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-11-09 17:04 ` [PATCH v3 22/24] Document new "x" and "print" memory tagging extensions Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-11-09 17:16 ` Eli Zaretskii via Gdb-patches
2020-11-09 17:04 ` [PATCH v3 23/24] Add NEWS entry Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-11-09 17:19 ` Eli Zaretskii via Gdb-patches
2020-11-09 17:22 ` Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-11-09 17:04 ` [PATCH v3 24/24] Add memory tagging testcases Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-11-16 15:47 ` David Spickett via Gdb-patches
2020-11-16 16:51 ` Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-12-27 4:36 ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2020-12-29 19:32 ` Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-11-16 13:48 ` [PATCH v3 00/24] Memory Tagging Support + AArch64 Linux implementation Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-11-16 14:37 ` Alan Hayward via Gdb-patches
2020-11-23 16:08 ` Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-11-30 13:38 ` Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-12-07 13:17 ` Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-12-07 14:17 ` Alan Hayward via Gdb-patches
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201109170435.15766-2-luis.machado@linaro.org \
--to=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=david.spickett@linaro.org \
--cc=luis.machado@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox