From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gnu.wildebeest.org (wildebeest.demon.nl [212.238.236.112]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A8963857C45 for ; Sat, 22 Aug 2020 18:53:47 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 0A8963857C45 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=klomp.org Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=mark@klomp.org Received: from librem (deer0x15.wildebeest.org [172.31.17.151]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gnu.wildebeest.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 02FF53002033; Sat, 22 Aug 2020 20:53:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: by librem (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 605CFC161B; Sat, 22 Aug 2020 20:53:04 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2020 20:53:04 +0200 From: Mark Wielaard To: Pedro Alves Cc: Simon Marchi , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove stale "register" bits from gdb.cp/misc.cc (Re: [PATCH] Move "register" test out of classes.exp to a separate testcase) Message-ID: <20200822185304.GA3854@wildebeest.org> References: <20200822121935.6086-1-mark@klomp.org> <4a45bd6b-2d4c-10c9-03af-2a8be5e37783@palves.net> <9ed2dbe1-9f38-7035-9cbc-457d2f0c7889@palves.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <9ed2dbe1-9f38-7035-9cbc-457d2f0c7889@palves.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2020 18:53:48 -0000 On Sat, Aug 22, 2020 at 06:11:49PM +0100, Pedro Alves wrote: > On 8/22/20 6:08 PM, Pedro Alves wrote: > > > See patch below. I propose we push this in instead. > > And then this on top. I cannot claim to fully understand the patches, but they work on my setup, classes, misc and inherit all compile and PASS all tests (misc does have one duplicate "pointer addition with integer reference"). Cheers, Mark