[PATCH 3/7] Avoid constant stream of TARGET_WAITKIND_NO_RESUMED

[Pedro Alves <pedro@palves.net>]

If we hit the synchronous execution command case described by
handle_no_resumed, and handle_no_resumed determines that the event
should be ignored, because it found a thread that is executing, we end
up in prepare_to_wait.

There, if the current target is not registered in the event loop right
now, we call mark_infrun_async_event_handler.  With that event handler
marked, the event loop calls again into fetch_inferior_event, which
calls target_wait, which returns TARGET_WAITKIND_NO_RESUMED, and we
end up in handle_no_resumed, again ignoring the event and marking
infrun_async_event_handler.  The result is that GDB is now always
keeping the CPU 100% busy in this loop, even though it continues to be
able to react to input and to real target events, because we still go
through the event-loop.

The problem is that marking of the infrun_async_event_handler in
prepare_to_wait.  That is there to handle targets that don't support
asynchronous execution.  So the correct predicate is whether async
execution is supported, not whether the target is async right now.

gdb/ChangeLog:

	PR gdb/26199
	* infrun.c (prepare_to_wait): Check target_can_async_p instead of
	target_is_async_p.
---
 gdb/infrun.c | 6 +++++-
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/gdb/infrun.c b/gdb/infrun.c
index 6b655d4430..a01e0969cb 100644
--- a/gdb/infrun.c
+++ b/gdb/infrun.c
@@ -8116,7 +8116,11 @@ prepare_to_wait (struct execution_control_state *ecs)
 
   ecs->wait_some_more = 1;
 
-  if (!target_is_async_p ())
+  /* If the target can't async, emulate it by marking the infrun event
+     handler such that as soon as we get back to the event-loop, we
+     immediately end up in fetch_inferior_event again calling
+     target_wait.  */
+  if (!target_can_async_p ())
     mark_infrun_async_event_handler ();
 }
 
-- 
2.14.5