Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kamil Rytarowski <n54@gmx.com>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Cc: simark@simark.ca, Kamil Rytarowski <n54@gmx.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4] Avoid get_ptrace_pid() usage on NetBSD in x86-bsd-nat.c
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2020 14:36:07 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200319133607.11872-1-n54@gmx.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200319131801.22487-1-n54@gmx.com>

Add gdb_ptrace() that wraps the ptrace(2) API and correctly passes
the pid,lwp pair to the calls on NetBSD; and the result of
get_ptrace_pid() on other BSD Operating Systems.

gdb/ChangeLog:

	* x86-bsd-nat.c (gdb_ptrace): New.
	* (x86bsd_dr_set): Add new argument `ptid'.
	* (x86bsd_dr_get, x86bsd_dr_set, x86bsd_dr_set_control,
	x86bsd_dr_set_addr): Update.
---
 gdb/ChangeLog     |  7 +++++++
 gdb/x86-bsd-nat.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gdb/ChangeLog b/gdb/ChangeLog
index 7f87eceaf70..0955d648e79 100644
--- a/gdb/ChangeLog
+++ b/gdb/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+2020-03-19  Kamil Rytarowski  <n54@gmx.com>
+
+	* x86-bsd-nat.c (gdb_ptrace): New.
+	* (x86bsd_dr_set): Add new argument `ptid'.
+	* (x86bsd_dr_get, x86bsd_dr_set, x86bsd_dr_set_control,
+	x86bsd_dr_set_addr): Update.
+
 2020-03-19  Andrew Burgess  <andrew.burgess@embecosm.com>

 	* remote.c (remote_target::process_stop_reply): Handle events for
diff --git a/gdb/x86-bsd-nat.c b/gdb/x86-bsd-nat.c
index 640a3c28110..9e2bea1e020 100644
--- a/gdb/x86-bsd-nat.c
+++ b/gdb/x86-bsd-nat.c
@@ -33,6 +33,19 @@
 #include "inf-ptrace.h"
 \f

+static int
+gdb_ptrace (PTRACE_TYPE_ARG1 request, ptid_t ptid, PTRACE_TYPE_ARG3 addr)
+{
+#ifdef __NetBSD__
+  /* Support for NetBSD threads: unlike other ptrace implementations in this
+     file, NetBSD requires that we pass both the pid and lwp.  */
+  return ptrace (request, ptid.pid (), addr, ptid.lwp ());
+#else
+  pid_t pid = get_ptrace_pid (ptid);
+  return ptrace (request, pid, addr, 0);
+#endif
+}
+
 #ifdef PT_GETXSTATE_INFO
 size_t x86bsd_xsave_len;
 #endif
@@ -56,31 +69,19 @@ static unsigned long
 x86bsd_dr_get (ptid_t ptid, int regnum)
 {
   struct dbreg dbregs;
-#ifdef __NetBSD__
-  int lwp = inferior_ptid.lwp ();
-#else
-  int lwp = 0;
-#endif

-  if (ptrace (PT_GETDBREGS, get_ptrace_pid (inferior_ptid),
-	      (PTRACE_TYPE_ARG3) &dbregs, lwp) == -1)
+  if (gdb_ptrace (PT_GETDBREGS, ptid, (PTRACE_TYPE_ARG3) &dbregs) == -1)
     perror_with_name (_("Couldn't read debug registers"));

   return DBREG_DRX ((&dbregs), regnum);
 }

 static void
-x86bsd_dr_set (int regnum, unsigned long value)
+x86bsd_dr_set (ptid_t ptid, int regnum, unsigned long value)
 {
   struct dbreg dbregs;
-#ifdef __NetBSD__
-  int lwp = inferior_ptid.lwp ();
-#else
-  int lwp = 0;
-#endif

-  if (ptrace (PT_GETDBREGS, get_ptrace_pid (inferior_ptid),
-              (PTRACE_TYPE_ARG3) &dbregs, lwp) == -1)
+  if (gdb_ptrace (PT_GETDBREGS, ptid, (PTRACE_TYPE_ARG3) &dbregs) == -1)
     perror_with_name (_("Couldn't get debug registers"));

   /* For some mysterious reason, some of the reserved bits in the
@@ -92,12 +93,8 @@ x86bsd_dr_set (int regnum, unsigned long value)

   for (thread_info *thread : current_inferior ()->non_exited_threads ())
     {
-#ifdef __NetBSD__
-      lwp = thread->ptid.lwp ();
-#endif
-
-      if (ptrace (PT_SETDBREGS, get_ptrace_pid (thread->ptid),
-		  (PTRACE_TYPE_ARG3) &dbregs, lwp) == -1)
+      if (gdb_ptrace (PT_SETDBREGS, thread->ptid,
+		      (PTRACE_TYPE_ARG3) &dbregs) == -1)
 	perror_with_name (_("Couldn't write debug registers"));
     }
 }
@@ -105,7 +102,7 @@ x86bsd_dr_set (int regnum, unsigned long value)
 static void
 x86bsd_dr_set_control (unsigned long control)
 {
-  x86bsd_dr_set (7, control);
+  x86bsd_dr_set (inferior_ptid, 7, control);
 }

 static void
@@ -113,7 +110,7 @@ x86bsd_dr_set_addr (int regnum, CORE_ADDR addr)
 {
   gdb_assert (regnum >= 0 && regnum <= 4);

-  x86bsd_dr_set (regnum, addr);
+  x86bsd_dr_set (inferior_ptid, regnum, addr);
 }

 static CORE_ADDR
--
2.25.0



  reply	other threads:[~2020-03-19 13:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-18 16:13 [PATCH] " Kamil Rytarowski
2020-03-19  1:35 ` Simon Marchi
2020-03-19 12:47   ` Kamil Rytarowski
2020-03-19 13:22     ` Simon Marchi
2020-03-19 13:36       ` Kamil Rytarowski
2020-03-19 13:18   ` [PATCH v3] " Kamil Rytarowski
2020-03-19 13:36     ` Kamil Rytarowski [this message]
2020-03-19 13:40       ` [PATCH v4] " Simon Marchi
2020-03-19 13:08 ` [PATCH v2] " Kamil Rytarowski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200319133607.11872-1-n54@gmx.com \
    --to=n54@gmx.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=simark@simark.ca \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox