From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <brobecker@adacore.com>
Received: from rock.gnat.com (rock.gnat.com [205.232.38.15])
 by server2.sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED718387102A
 for <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>; Sat,  7 Mar 2020 11:58:53 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 999E3560B7;
 Sat,  7 Mar 2020 06:58:53 -0500 (EST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at gnat.com
Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with LMTP id 7r3yUL9KORpL; Sat,  7 Mar 2020 06:58:53 -0500 (EST)
Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 044AA560B6;
 Sat,  7 Mar 2020 06:58:53 -0500 (EST)
Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
 id 2105783857; Sat,  7 Mar 2020 12:58:49 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2020 12:58:49 +0100
From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
To: Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrew Burgess <andrew.burgess@embecosm.com>,
 GDB Patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>,
 Philippe Waroquiers <philippe.waroquiers@skynet.be>,
 Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix printf of a convenience variable holding an inferior
 address
Message-ID: <20200307115849.GA20426@adacore.com>
References: <20190610211622.15237-1-philippe.waroquiers@skynet.be>
 <20200302024616.1049417-1-sergiodj@redhat.com>
 <20200303133918.GV3317@embecosm.com> <877e01h06g.fsf@redhat.com>
 <87wo81criy.fsf@redhat.com> <20200304105330.GA4745@adacore.com>
 <8736al5d8s.fsf@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <8736al5d8s.fsf@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on
 server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://sourceware.org/mailman/options/gdb-patches>,
 <mailto:gdb-patches-request@sourceware.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-request@sourceware.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://sourceware.org/mailman/listinfo/gdb-patches>,
 <mailto:gdb-patches-request@sourceware.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Mar 2020 11:59:04 -0000

> Yeah, this is a regression.  GDB 8.3 worked fine.

OK. Thanks for confirming, Sergio.

> > In terms of putting it in 9.2, I think we could do it; the patch
> > does look safe to me.
> 
> Cool.  So, is the process the same (now that we're using a different
> versioning scheme)?  Do I just open a bug again 9.1 and push the
> backported patch to the branch?

Correct :). If you don't mind, it might be useful to amend the
ChangeLog entry in master to include the PR number.

Thanks Sergio!
-- 
Joel