From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 40561 invoked by alias); 26 Jan 2020 11:40:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 40553 invoked by uid 89); 26 Jan 2020 11:40:40 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-5.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=door, 25155, UD:www.sourceware.org, www.sourceware.org X-HELO: rock.gnat.com Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Sun, 26 Jan 2020 11:40:39 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18629116646; Sun, 26 Jan 2020 06:40:38 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id Z+Kt1Q8SzNDv; Sun, 26 Jan 2020 06:40:38 -0500 (EST) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D48B116596; Sun, 26 Jan 2020 06:40:37 -0500 (EST) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1EA8982CEE; Sun, 26 Jan 2020 15:40:33 +0400 (+04) Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2020 15:41:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Cc: palves@redhat.com, Iain Buclaw , Nick Alcock , Eli Zaretskii Subject: Propose we release GDB 9.1 next weekend (Feb 01-02) Message-ID: <20200126114033.GA20733@adacore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) X-SW-Source: 2020-01/txt/msg00844.txt.bz2 Hello everyone, As far as I can tell, we still have a couple of issues open, with unfortunately no progress that I can tell for the past week or so. At this point, the GDB 9.1 release has really been a long time coming, we really should try to get it out the door soon. Here are the remaining known issue, with my comments on how I propose we proceed: - [IanB/PedroA] output out of order / issue with filtered/unfiltered output order https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2019-11/msg00859.html Affects cgdb via annotations: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25190 These are the patches that have been proposed: (a) https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2019-11/msg01120.html (b) https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2019-11/msg01121.html As far as I can tell: For (a), the patch doesn't look unreasonable and is pretty simple. Andrew sent some comments, but we didn't get an updated version. For (b), Simon mentioned that he was trying to apply it, and was then able to. But I haven't seen any comments on it. So I took a look, and sent my first impressions on the patch: https://www.sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2020-01/msg00842.html => At this point, I am not confident that we are going to be able to solve that issue right away. Since there is an easy work around for this issue, I propose we consider this issue as *not* blocking for 9.1. - [Eliz/NickA/JoelB] libtcf fails to build on MinGW https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25155 The only issue left to fix is the issue with errno. => Still waiting for Nick. Rather than putting more pressure on Nick, I propose we go with Eli's patch of providing fallback errno values. When Nick is able to confirm his final patch, we'll decide whether to backport or stay with the simpler patch from Eli. Pending comments, I will work on the GDB 9.1 release during the weekend of Feb 01-02. Thank you! -- Joel