From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24272 invoked by alias); 24 Dec 2019 03:47:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 24259 invoked by uid 89); 24 Dec 2019 03:47:01 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-5.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=Nice, relatively, HX-Languages-Length:1935, rfa X-HELO: rock.gnat.com Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Dec 2019 03:47:00 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CACA11165D5; Mon, 23 Dec 2019 22:46:56 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id RCW0xPC-Ww32; Mon, 23 Dec 2019 22:46:56 -0500 (EST) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 653071165A4; Mon, 23 Dec 2019 22:46:56 -0500 (EST) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1F8A8899C3; Tue, 24 Dec 2019 07:46:52 +0400 (+04) Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2019 03:47:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: GDB 9.1 release 2019-12-23 update Message-ID: <20191224034652.GA25918@adacore.com> References: <20191223093031.GE11677@adacore.com> <835zi7xh7o.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <835zi7xh7o.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) X-SW-Source: 2019-12/txt/msg00989.txt.bz2 > > So, as far as I know, the only issues that are still open are > > the issues that Eli found with the pre-release. > > Sorry about that. Not your fault! > > - [EliZ] readline/colors.c build failure > > > > Caused by S_IXGRP and S_IXOTH not being defined on MinGW. > > Patch sent to readline, and should be applied to our local > > tree soon. > > Will do soon. Nice. > > - [EliZ] configure warning when checking for pthread-config > > > > Problem understood, but EliZ blocked because he doesn't have > > the correct auto-tools version. Hopefully building those > > from source is an option. > > I believe this was already fixed. Double Nice. > > - [Eliz] libtcf fails to build on MinGW > > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25155 > > > > Problem reported to binutils on Dec 17th, but so far > > no answer as far as I can tell. > > https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2019-12/msg00277.html > > > > If we don't get an answer after the end of year holidays, > > I suggest we send in a patch, which will likely help move > > things along. From Eli's message on bugzilla, we shouldn't > > be far from having one. > > I already have a patch, so I can apply it whenever you say so. Let's try to have it reviewed by the binutils folks if we can. It seems relatively straightforward, but I tend to avoid fixing things in a branch before it gets fixed in master. Maybe send the patch to binutils with an RFA? If that doesn't work, then we'll consider the option of just patching our branch so we can release. > > Are there other issues that I may have missed for which we should > > wait until we can release GDB 9.1? > > What about the compilation warning in record-btrace.c I reported in > https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2019-12/msg00706.html? Do we > want to fix it? We can, but (IMO) not super critical. FWIW, I don't get the warning when buidling on GNU/Linux. -- Joel