Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Pedro Alves (Code Review)" <gerrit@gnutoolchain-gerrit.osci.io>
To: Tom Tromey <tromey@sourceware.org>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: [review v3] Introduce thread-safe way to handle SIGSEGV
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2019 20:07:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191122200741.B9B892816F@gnutoolchain-gerrit.osci.io> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <gerrit.1571543710000.Ic832bbb033b64744e4b44f14b41db7e4168ce427@gnutoolchain-gerrit.osci.io>

Pedro Alves has posted comments on this change.

Change URL: https://gnutoolchain-gerrit.osci.io/r/c/binutils-gdb/+/171
......................................................................


Patch Set 3:

(2 comments)

| --- gdb/cp-support.c
| +++ gdb/cp-support.c
| @@ -1474,20 +1477,20 @@ /* If true, attempt to catch crashes in the demangler and print
|     useful debugging information.  */
|  
|  static bool catch_demangler_crashes = true;
|  
|  /* Stack context and environment for demangler crash recovery.  */
|  
| -static SIGJMP_BUF gdb_demangle_jmp_buf;
| +static thread_local SIGJMP_BUF *gdb_demangle_jmp_buf;
|  
|  /* If nonzero, attempt to dump core from the signal handler.  */

PS3, Line 1485:

"If true,"

|  
| -static int gdb_demangle_attempt_core_dump = 1;
| +static std::atomic<bool> gdb_demangle_attempt_core_dump;

PS3, Line 1487:

Is there anything ever initializing this to true?

Makes me ponder about a maintenance command to force a SIGSEGV.

|  
|  /* Signal handler for gdb_demangle.  */
|  
|  static void
|  gdb_demangle_signal_handler (int signo)
|  {
|    if (gdb_demangle_attempt_core_dump)
|      {
|        if (fork () == 0)

-- 
Gerrit-Project: binutils-gdb
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: Ic832bbb033b64744e4b44f14b41db7e4168ce427
Gerrit-Change-Number: 171
Gerrit-PatchSet: 3
Gerrit-Owner: Tom Tromey <tromey@sourceware.org>
Gerrit-CC: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2019 20:07:41 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Gerrit-MessageType: comment


  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-11-22 20:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-20  4:02 [review] " Tom Tromey (Code Review)
2019-10-30 22:54 ` [review v3] " Tom Tromey (Code Review)
2019-11-22 20:07 ` Pedro Alves (Code Review) [this message]
2019-11-22 23:12 ` Tom Tromey (Code Review)
2019-11-22 23:50 ` [review v4] " Tom Tromey (Code Review)
2019-11-26 15:58 ` Pedro Alves (Code Review)
2019-11-26 16:11 ` Tom Tromey (Code Review)
2019-11-26 16:23 ` Pedro Alves (Code Review)
2019-11-26 21:13 ` [pushed] " Sourceware to Gerrit sync (Code Review)
2019-11-26 21:14 ` Sourceware to Gerrit sync (Code Review)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191122200741.B9B892816F@gnutoolchain-gerrit.osci.io \
    --to=gerrit@gnutoolchain-gerrit.osci.io \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=gnutoolchain-gerrit@osci.io \
    --cc=tromey@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox