From: "Luis Machado (Code Review)" <gerrit@gnutoolchain-gerrit.osci.io>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Cc: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@polymtl.ca>
Subject: [review v2] [AArch64, SVE] Improve target description check for SVE in gdbserver
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 14:30:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191119142955.C19A72816F@gnutoolchain-gerrit.osci.io> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <gerrit.1574172175000.I28b782cb1677560ca9a06a1be442974b25aabae4@gnutoolchain-gerrit.osci.io>
Luis Machado has posted comments on this change.
Change URL: https://gnutoolchain-gerrit.osci.io/r/c/binutils-gdb/+/690
......................................................................
Patch Set 2:
(3 comments)
| --- gdb/gdbserver/tdesc.c
| +++ gdb/gdbserver/tdesc.c
| @@ -184,5 +184,22 @@ tdesc_create_feature (struct target_desc *tdesc, const char *name)
| {
| struct tdesc_feature *new_feature = new tdesc_feature (name);
| tdesc->features.emplace_back (new_feature);
| return new_feature;
| }
| +
| +/* See gdbsupport/tdesc.h. */
| +
| +bool
| +tdesc_contains_feature (const target_desc *tdesc, const std::string feature)
PS2, Line 193:
Thanks! I'll fix this. Getting up to speed on the cpp-ness of it!
| +{
| + if (tdesc && !tdesc->features.empty ())
PS2, Line 195:
No use case in particular for a NULL tdesc, though i tend to think
having the check here prevents having to add such a check elsewhere.
We don't want gdbserver to die when we see a NULL tdesc for example.
Unless a NULL tdesc is a major error we don't want to allow. Then i
agree an assert would be good. Thoughts?
| + {
| + for (const tdesc_feature_up &f : tdesc->features)
| + {
| + if (f->name.compare (feature) == 0)
PS2, Line 199:
I'll fix this.
| + return true;
| + }
| + }
| +
| + return false;
| +}
--
Gerrit-Project: binutils-gdb
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I28b782cb1677560ca9a06a1be442974b25aabae4
Gerrit-Change-Number: 690
Gerrit-PatchSet: 2
Gerrit-Owner: Luis Machado <luis.machado@linaro.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Luis Machado <luis.machado@linaro.org>
Gerrit-CC: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@polymtl.ca>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 14:29:55 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@polymtl.ca>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-19 14:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-19 14:03 [review] " Luis Machado (Code Review)
2019-11-19 14:05 ` [review v2] " Luis Machado (Code Review)
2019-11-19 14:23 ` Simon Marchi (Code Review)
2019-11-19 14:30 ` Luis Machado (Code Review) [this message]
2019-11-19 14:43 ` [review v3] " Luis Machado (Code Review)
2019-11-19 15:03 ` Simon Marchi (Code Review)
2019-11-19 15:14 ` [review v4] " Luis Machado (Code Review)
2019-11-20 16:34 ` Alan Hayward
2019-11-20 16:51 ` Luis Machado
[not found] ` <c30acac0-f73f-c368-d980-94ece81e92e5@polymtl.ca>
2019-11-21 8:23 ` Alan Hayward
2019-11-20 16:59 ` [pushed] " Sourceware to Gerrit sync (Code Review)
2019-11-20 16:59 ` Sourceware to Gerrit sync (Code Review)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191119142955.C19A72816F@gnutoolchain-gerrit.osci.io \
--to=gerrit@gnutoolchain-gerrit.osci.io \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=gnutoolchain-gerrit@osci.io \
--cc=simon.marchi@polymtl.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox