From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 114611 invoked by alias); 19 Nov 2019 01:12:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 114603 invoked by uid 89); 19 Nov 2019 01:12:50 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=sadly, all!, mismatched, doublechecking X-HELO: rock.gnat.com Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 01:12:40 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B2C056154; Mon, 18 Nov 2019 20:12:38 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id etvPpUIjnx1V; Mon, 18 Nov 2019 20:12:38 -0500 (EST) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1A8E560CE; Mon, 18 Nov 2019 20:12:37 -0500 (EST) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0261B8C36D; Mon, 18 Nov 2019 17:12:35 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 01:12:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, tdevries@suse.de, cbiesinger@google.com, philippe.waroquiers@skynet.be, andrew.burgess@embecosm.com, tom@tromey.com Subject: GDB 9.1 release -- 2019-11-18 Update Message-ID: <20191119011235.GD2568@adacore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) X-SW-Source: 2019-11/txt/msg00573.txt.bz2 Hi everyone, If you see your name attached to an item, would you mind double-checking that the status is correct? I'm wondering, for instance, if some patches might be open on gerrit while a different patch got pushed in the end, but without the same ChangeId in the revision log (preventing Gerrit from detecting that the patch was pushed, and thus closing the review). Here is another update. Sadly, it looks like progress on the specific items we identified has been slow (1 item moved to the "done" section). As in the previous update, we can use the "for-9.1" tag to identify patches that we think should go in GDB 9.1. Here is the URL to the corresponding dashboard: https://gnutoolchain-gerrit.osci.io/r/q/hashtag:%22for-9.1%22+(status:open%20OR%20status:merged As a quick overview, as of today, we are at: - 3 merged - 1 pending (I think it will go in soon) - 11 patches that no longer apply ("Merge Conflict") :-( Still Pending: -------------- - [Tom DV] Only force INTERP_CONSOLE ui_out for breakpoint commands in MI mode https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2019-10/msg00099.html Gerrit: https://gnutoolchain-gerrit.osci.io/r/c/binutils-gdb/+/28 Pedro gave it the OK, but mentioned that he'd like Andrew to review. - [Tom DV] Prefer var def over decl https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2019-09/msg00161.html Gerrit: https://gnutoolchain-gerrit.osci.io/r/c/binutils-gdb/+/29 Tom T said the patch is reasonable, but was wondering whether we shouldn't even be in that situation in the first place, if we were to not create symbols for declarations... This lead to a different patch, but after discussion, we propose the original patch for trunk to start, and then discuss the alternative approach after 9.x branching. Joel is double-checking with TomT that this is OK with him as well. - [Christian B] The threaded symbol loading that tromey Christian have been working on Gerrit: https://gnutoolchain-gerrit.osci.io/r/q/topic:%22minsyms-threads%22+(status:open%20OR%20status:merged) This patchset was identified as a risk for inclusion so close to branching, due to the use of threads for parallelizing the load of minsyms. However, considering the potentially massive gains to be had on large programs, the consensus was to allow this patch under the control of a setting, off by default; and then remove that setting once we've branched. - [TomT] Fix the "winheight" command https://gnutoolchain-gerrit.osci.io/r/c/binutils-gdb/+/371 Fixes a regression. Tom says it can be backported after branching if needed. - [TomT] Handle pending stops from the Windows kernel Gerrit: https://gnutoolchain-gerrit.osci.io/r/c/binutils-gdb/+/414 - [TomT] Add pending stop support to gdbserver's Windows port Gerrit: https://gnutoolchain-gerrit.osci.io/r/c/binutils-gdb/+/432 Fixes an internal-error. If reviewed and completed in time: ---------------------------------- - [PhilippeW] [RFC] Have an option to tell GDB to detect and possibly handle mismatched exec-files https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2019-09/msg00580.html - [PhilippeW] Allow the user to define default leading args for commands and aliases https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2019-09/msg00583.html - [PhilippeW] Implement 'print -raw-values' and 'set print raw-values on|off' https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2019-09/msg00582.html - [PhilippeW] More flexible user-defined commands prefixing and naming https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2019-09/msg00588.html - [AndrewB] MI access to some new CLI commands Gerrit: https://gnutoolchain-gerrit.osci.io/r/c/binutils-gdb/+/264 Gerrit: https://gnutoolchain-gerrit.osci.io/r/c/binutils-gdb/+/265 Gerrit: https://gnutoolchain-gerrit.osci.io/r/c/binutils-gdb/+/266 Gerrit: https://gnutoolchain-gerrit.osci.io/r/c/binutils-gdb/+/267 Gerrit: https://gnutoolchain-gerrit.osci.io/r/c/binutils-gdb/+/268 Gerrit: https://gnutoolchain-gerrit.osci.io/r/c/binutils-gdb/+/269 Most of these patches already pre-reviewed. Completed since the last update (2019-11-11): --------------------------------------------- - [AndrewB] gdb: Support printf 'z' size modifier Gerrit: https://gnutoolchain-gerrit.osci.io/r/c/binutils-gdb/+/511 Fixes a regression. Thank you all! -- Joel