From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 68965 invoked by alias); 12 Oct 2019 19:19:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 68955 invoked by uid 89); 12 Oct 2019 19:19:43 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-5.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=NEWS, you! X-HELO: rock.gnat.com Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Sat, 12 Oct 2019 19:19:42 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA4D45610A for ; Sat, 12 Oct 2019 15:19:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 5DuVEeLlebaz for ; Sat, 12 Oct 2019 15:19:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F09F56108 for ; Sat, 12 Oct 2019 15:19:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E85AA82184; Sat, 12 Oct 2019 15:19:38 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2019 19:19:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: GDB 9.1 release: Start of stabilization period ? Message-ID: <20191012191938.GA2675@adacore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) X-SW-Source: 2019-10/txt/msg00310.txt.bz2 Hi everyone, Now that the 8.3.1 release is out, I think now is a good time to prepare the 9.1 release. I looked at the gdb/NEWS file and it is chockablock full of goodies! At the moment, there aren't any issues in bugzilla that are marked pending for GDB 9.1. Are there any issues that people would like to be fixed, before we release GDB 9.1? For those issues, it would be good to see whether these are blocking issues prior to branching, or not. In the meantime, while we start collecting the list of issues we want to fix for 9.1, if there aren't any objection, I'd like us to start a cooling period so as to stabilize GDB prior to branching. Thank you! -- Joel