From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18452 invoked by alias); 12 Sep 2019 11:30:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 18438 invoked by uid 89); 12 Sep 2019 11:30:46 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=H*M:lan, HX-Languages-Length:664 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 11:30:45 +0000 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6DD48309BDB9 for ; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 11:30:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from f29-4.lan (ovpn-117-13.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.117.13]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47E5D5D9E2 for ; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 11:30:44 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2019 11:30:00 -0000 From: Kevin Buettner To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFAv2] Fix internal error and improve 'set debug infrun 1'/target wait kind trace Message-ID: <20190912043043.1f57c212@f29-4.lan> In-Reply-To: <57392d44-7d10-7009-2f5e-fd790adcbef4@suse.de> References: <20190330095831.5616-1-philippe.waroquiers@skynet.be> <20190401093248.615b2c5c@f29-4.lan> <1554145505.1854.7.camel@skynet.be> <57392d44-7d10-7009-2f5e-fd790adcbef4@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2019-09/txt/msg00217.txt.bz2 On Wed, 11 Sep 2019 19:05:19 +0200 Tom de Vries wrote: > I ran today into the failure that this commit fixes: > ... > FAIL: gdb.threads/watchthreads-reorder.exp: reorder1: continue to > breakpoint: break-at-exit (GDB internal error) > ... > on the 8.3 branch. > > My understanding from reading the rationale is that this is sufficiently > cornercase to not merit a backport, but perhaps someone thinks otherwise? > > If we decide not to backport, we could perhaps mark this as as KFAIL in > the 8.3 branch? Marking it as a KFAIL is okay with me... Kevin