From: Andrew Burgess <andrew.burgess@embecosm.com>
To: Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][gdb/testsuite] Fix command result testing in mi-complete.exp
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 08:26:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190723082649.GF23204@embecosm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190723075010.GA27426@delia>
* Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de> [2019-07-23 09:50:12 +0200]:
> Hi,
>
> When running gdb.mi/mi-complete.exp in conjunction with:
> ...
> $ stress -c $(($(cat /proc/cpuinfo | grep -c "^processor") + 1))
> ...
> we get less than 50% full passes:
> ...
> $ for n in $(seq 1 100); do \
> make V=1 -O check \
> 'RUNTESTFLAGS=gdb.mi/mi-complete.exp --target_board=unix'; \
> done 2>&1 \
> | grep "expected passes" | sort | uniq -c
> 45 # of expected passes 7
> 9 # of expected passes 8
> 46 # of expected passes 9
> ...
>
> A diff between a passing and failing gdb.log shows this difference:
> ...
> -&"set max-completions 1\n"
> 2-complete br
> +&"set max-completions 1\n"
> ...
>
> The problem is that the test-case issues the "set max-completion <n>" command,
> and without waiting for the output issues a next command, and tries to parse
> the results of both commands, expecting a specific interleaving of the various
> output streams.
>
> Fix the FAIL by waiting for the result of the "set max-completion <n>" command
> before issuing another command.
>
> Tested on x86_64-linux.
>
> OK for trunk?
Looks good to me.
Thanks,
Andrew
>
> Thanks,
> - Tom
>
> [gdb/testsuite] Fix command result testing in mi-complete.exp
>
> gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>
> 2019-07-23 Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>
>
> PR testsuite/24711
> * gdb.mi/mi-complete.exp: Wait for "set max-completions" result before
> issuing next command.
>
> ---
> gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/mi-complete.exp | 6 ++++--
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/mi-complete.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/mi-complete.exp
> index 692b004fd9..5b9613548f 100644
> --- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/mi-complete.exp
> +++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/mi-complete.exp
> @@ -58,14 +58,16 @@ mi_gdb_test "-info-gdb-mi-command complete" \
>
> # Limit max completions and check that max_completions_reached=\"0\" is set
> # to 1.
> -send_gdb "set max-completions 1\n"
> +mi_gdb_test "set max-completions 1" ".*=cmd-param-changed.*\\^done" \
> + "set max-completions 1"
>
> mi_gdb_test "2-complete br" \
> ".*2\\^done,completion=\"br\[A-Za-z0-9-\]+\",matches=\\\[\"br\[A-Za-z0-9-\]+\"\\\],max_completions_reached=\"1\"" \
> "-complete br, max-completions 1"
>
> # Disable completions and check an error is returned
> -send_gdb "set max-completions 0\n"
> +mi_gdb_test "set max-completions 0" ".*=cmd-param-changed.*\\^done" \
> + "set max-completions 0"
>
> mi_gdb_test "3-complete br" \
> ".*3\\^error,msg=\".*" \
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-23 8:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-23 7:50 Tom de Vries
2019-07-23 8:26 ` Andrew Burgess [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190723082649.GF23204@embecosm.com \
--to=andrew.burgess@embecosm.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=tdevries@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox