From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 74025 invoked by alias); 22 Apr 2019 15:20:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 74017 invoked by uid 89); 22 Apr 2019 15:20:18 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=examine, H*F:D*t-online.de, H*r:sk:mailout, H*RU:sk:mailout X-HELO: mailout05.t-online.de Received: from mailout05.t-online.de (HELO mailout05.t-online.de) (194.25.134.82) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 Apr 2019 15:20:16 +0000 Received: from fwd15.aul.t-online.de (fwd15.aul.t-online.de [172.20.27.63]) by mailout05.t-online.de (Postfix) with SMTP id 154F0421746C; Mon, 22 Apr 2019 17:20:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (G0COL4ZarhXk5DPK+QXk61g+LFZCddyFnAtixJZ4gxmJ2uczUUPtgyb5ZfBntIJZAU@[80.143.220.83]) by fwd15.t-online.de with (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) esmtp id 1hIajg-2QzV0C0; Mon, 22 Apr 2019 17:20:00 +0200 Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2019 15:20:00 -0000 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Andr=E9_P=F6nitz?= To: Pedro Alves Cc: Joel Brobecker , Eli Zaretskii , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFA 2/2][master only] gdb/windows-nat.c: Get rid of main_thread_id global Message-ID: <20190422152327.GA10697@klara.mpi.htwm.de> References: <1555453982-77808-1-git-send-email-brobecker@adacore.com> <1555453982-77808-3-git-send-email-brobecker@adacore.com> <83imvcg0ud.fsf@gnu.org> <20190417173842.GA14817@adacore.com> <83wojseb9c.fsf@gnu.org> <20190417221729.GA5839@adacore.com> <9c75d158-6a73-d414-4cb2-17297d4576c6@redhat.com> <20190419204326.GA9601@adacore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2019-04/txt/msg00421.txt.bz2 On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 03:24:46PM +0100, Pedro Alves wrote: > I don't see the asymmetry (silent at creation, not silent at destruction) > in this particular case as surprising [...] It's not surprising, but it's inconsistent and causes extra work in cases one wants to mechanically examine such output. Andre'