From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 51099 invoked by alias); 27 Mar 2019 20:49:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 45917 invoked by uid 89); 27 Mar 2019 20:49:18 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=HX-Languages-Length:521, H*M:lan X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Mar 2019 20:49:17 +0000 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5134FC05686F; Wed, 27 Mar 2019 20:49:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from f29-4.lan (ovpn-117-184.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.117.184]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 27DC017586; Wed, 27 Mar 2019 20:49:16 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2019 20:49:00 -0000 From: Kevin Buettner To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Cc: Alan Hayward Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] Testsuite: set sysroot when using gdbserver Message-ID: <20190327134915.5e9b19ba@f29-4.lan> In-Reply-To: <20190327164025.48105-1-alan.hayward@arm.com> References: <20190327164025.48105-1-alan.hayward@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2019-03/txt/msg00649.txt.bz2 On Wed, 27 Mar 2019 16:40:30 +0000 Alan Hayward wrote: > However, I'm not sure if putting the sysroot into gdbserver_start will break > other remote setups. In addition, I don't think gdb_test is the correct > function to call within the library - for the mi tests this causes a timeout > as it expect to use mi_gdb_test. Can sysroot be set in the board file(s)? If so, I think that would be preferable to your proposed patch. Kevin