From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 43362 invoked by alias); 29 Oct 2018 17:34:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 42352 invoked by uid 89); 29 Oct 2018 17:34:53 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=sergio, durigan, Durigan, junior X-HELO: jocasta.intra Received: from de.cellform.com (HELO jocasta.intra) (88.217.224.109) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 29 Oct 2018 17:34:51 +0000 Received: from jocasta.intra (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jocasta.intra (8.15.2/8.15.2/Debian-8) with ESMTPS id w9THYhqw012425 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 29 Oct 2018 18:34:43 +0100 Received: (from john@localhost) by jocasta.intra (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id w9THYgI5012424; Mon, 29 Oct 2018 18:34:42 +0100 Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2018 17:34:00 -0000 From: John Darrington To: Sergio Durigan Junior Cc: John Darrington , Simon Marchi , Rainer Orth , Simon Marchi , "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] GDBSERVER: Listen on a unix domain (instead of TCP) socket if requested. Message-ID: <20181029173442.al3yw354ncrk4ivs@jocasta.intra> References: <20181019185548.izouwatbcjwnrs2a@jocasta.intra> <877eidwwlz.fsf@redhat.com> <20181028181010.yt2xlp5in65xsc4f@jocasta.intra> <20181029082435.bxgluc6zdqs5ytbq@jocasta.intra> <4da7206f-6e6a-7aad-634e-a4485d99e988@ericsson.com> <20181029162513.oztznqp74gudrqgm@jocasta.intra> <87a7mwd7r0.fsf@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In-Reply-To: <87a7mwd7r0.fsf@redhat.com> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) X-SW-Source: 2018-10/txt/msg00696.txt.bz2 On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 12:42:43PM -0400, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: > If you think it necesary however I can revert anything you think has= n't > had enough discussion. =20=20=20=20=20 Yes, please. The patch series is not ready to be pushed yet; there are a bunch of points I raised that were not addressed (and are now causing the failures). I am not a global maintainer, but it is my opinion that the patch series should be reverted for now. We can continue discussi= ng and fixing things with it here in the list. =20=20=20=20=20 Done. Start discussing. J'